A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2006, Vol 1, Issue 1

Abstract

The principle of loss aversion is thought to explain a wide range of anomalous phenomena involving tradeoffs between losses and gains. In this article, I show that the anomalies loss aversion was introduced to explain - the risky bet premium, the endowment effect, and the status-quo bias - are characterized not only by a loss/gain tradeoff, but by a tradeoff between the status-quo and change; and, that a propensity towards the status-quo in the latter tradeoff is sufficient to explain these phenomena. Moreover, I show that two basic psychological principles - (1) that motives drive behavior; and (2) that preferences tend to be fuzzy and ill-defined - imply the existence of a robust and fundamental propensity of this sort. Thus, a loss aversion principle is rendered superfluous to an account of the phenomena it was introduced to explain.

Authors and Affiliations

David Gal

Keywords

Related Articles

Preferring balanced vs. advantageous peace agreements: A study of Israeli attitudes towards a two state solution

The paper extends research on fixed-pie perceptions by suggesting that disputants may prefer proposals that are perceived to be equally attractive to both parties (i.e., balanced) rather than one-sided, because balanced...

When less is more in the recognition heuristic

The “less is more effect” (LIME) occurs when a recognition-dependent agent has a greater probability of choosing the better item than a more knowledgeable agent who recognizes more items. Goldstein and Gigerenzer (2002)...

Goal center width, how to count sequences, and the gambler’s fallacy in goal penalty shootouts

Previous research has reported that the gambler’s fallacy could be detected in goalkeepers’ behavior during penalty shootouts. Following repeated kicks in the same direction, goalkeepers were more likely to dive in the o...

Individuals’ insight into intrapersonal externalities

An intrapersonal externality exists when an individual’s decisions affect the outcomes of her future decisions. It can result in decreasing or increasing average returns to the rate of consumption, as occurs in addiction...

The false allure of fast lures

The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) allegedly measures the tendency to override the prepotent incorrect answers to some special problems, and to engage in further reflection. A growing literature suggests that the CRT is...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677546
  • DOI -
  • Views 264
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

David Gal (2006). A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677546