A randomised clinical trial to compare the post dural puncture headache following spinal anaesthesia using 27G Quincke’s and 27G Whitacre’s spinal needles

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 1

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Spinal anaesthesia is one of the most commonly used technique in anaesthesia. It is economical, safe, cost effective, easy, needs less sophisticated anaesthetic equipment, drugs, post operative care hence preferred over general anaesthesia and most popular because of its profound analgesia and muscle relaxation. Objectives of the present study were to know the incidence of post dural puncture headache (PDPH), number of attempts for successful sub arachnoid block and incidence of failed spinal anaesthesia by using 27 G Quincke’s and Whitacre’s spinal needles. Methodology: This one year randomized clinical trial was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology, 400 patients between 20 to 60 years of age with ASA grade I and II undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries during the study period. The Institutional Ethical Clearance and written informed consent from patients was obtained the incidence of PDPH, number attempts and failed spinal anaesthesia were assessed. Results: In this study female preponderance was seen. Significantly high incidence of PDPH was recorded in Quincke group (3.98%) as compared to 0.57% in Whitacre group (p=0.031). Significantly less number of attempts were required using Whitacre 27 G needle (p=0.0001). Failed rates were higher in patients using Whitacre 27 G needle as compared Quincke 27 G needle (3.98% versus 2.84%). Conclusion: Overall the Whitacre 27 G needle has better results with respect to PDPH and number of attempts required for successful subarachnoid block whereas the incidence of failed spinal anaesthesia was less with Quincke 27 G needle.

Authors and Affiliations

P Savanth Kumar, Pogaku Gopi Krishna, G S Nikilesh Kumar

Keywords

Related Articles

Regional anesthesia in patients with scoliosis -A single centre clinical experience in India

Background of the study: Anesthesia in scoliotic spine is challenging because of the rotation of the vertebrae and indifferent spread of the drug following spinal blockade. The present prospective study was taken up to a...

A comparative study of 0.5% bupivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine in supraclavicular block in a tertiary care hospital

Background: supraclavicular brachial plexus block have assumed important role in modern anaesthesia practice as they provide ideal effective conditions without any general anaesthesia or adverse haemodynamic effects. Whi...

A randomised clinical trial to compare the butorphanol and nalbuphine as adjuvants in ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block

Background: Supraclavicular brachial plexus block provides complete anaesthesia for surgeries of upper limbs especially below the mid humerus.Using ultrasound for blocks not only increases the success rate but also reduc...

A study of post-operative analgesia, ambulation and discharge in patient of inguinal hernia repair by tap block versus splash block

Background: Innervation of the anterolateral abdominal wall arises from the anterior rami of spinal nerves T7 to L1. The anterior divisions of T7-T11 continue from the intercostal space to enter the abdominal wall betwee...

Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in supra-clavicular brachial plexus block

Background and Aim: The advantages of a supraclavicular technique over other brachial plexus block approaches are its rapid onset and complete and predictable anesthesia for entire upper extremity and particularly, hand...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP260994
  • DOI -
  • Views 179
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

P Savanth Kumar, Pogaku Gopi Krishna, G S Nikilesh Kumar (2017). A randomised clinical trial to compare the post dural puncture headache following spinal anaesthesia using 27G Quincke’s and 27G Whitacre’s spinal needles. Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology, 4(1), 5-9. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-260994