A randomized controlled study of dynamic compression plate (DCP) versus limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) in treatment of forearm bone fractures in adults (age 18-60 years)

Journal Title: International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 3

Abstract

Background and objectives: Fracture of forearm bone are one of the most common injuries seen in day to day practice. The forearm, in combination with the proximal and distal radioulnar joints, allows pronation and supination movements that are important to all of us in the usual activities of daily living. The forearm serves an important role in upper extremity function, facilitating positioning the hand in space, thus helping to provide the upper extremity with its unique mobility. Exacting and decisive management is required after fractures of the shafts of the radius and ulna if function is to be restored. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study comprising of 50 cases of Fracture of forearm bone with equal distribution of cases (using randomization list) i.e. 25 cases with Dynamic Compression Plating (DCP) (Group A) and 25 cases with Limited contact dynamic compression plating (LC-DCP) (Group B) was done with patients admitted to Sri Siddhartha Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Tumkur from April 2015 and April 2017. Results: The Limited contact dynamic compression plating of diaphyseal bones produced excellent Results, the advantages being early mobilization, rigid fixation and hence prevention of fracture disease. The only disadvantage is that it is more expensive than the DCP. Conclusions: The conclusion of our study was that Limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) has a definite advantage over Dynamic compression plate (DCP) with respect to time to union and screw placement in comminuted fractures and in case of osteoporotic bone, but the complications, duration of surgery and surgical technique virtually remains unchanged.

Authors and Affiliations

KB Ravi1, Teddy Abraham Mathew, Madhusudan H

Keywords

Related Articles

The role of entry point and correct reduction in post-operative outcome of intertrochanteric femur fractures treated by short and long proximal femoral nails

Introduction: This study was performed in the department of orthopaedics, VIMSAR, Burla between July 2015 and June 2017 for evaluation of outcome of the surgical treatment of patients with intertrochanteric fracture trea...

Epidemiological study of pelvic fracture in Jabalpur zone of Madhya Pradesh

This is a study of 244 cases of pelvic fracture presented in the selected centers of Jabalpur zone of Madhya Pradesh in the duration of two years from 2011 to 2013. Demographical characteristics of pelvic fractures like...

Clinical results of Mitchell’s osteotomy for treatment of hallux valgus. Study from a Tertiary centre in Kashmir

Background: Hallux vulgus means lateral deviation of great toe is in fact a complex deformity of the first ray. The concerns are pain over 1st metatarsophalangeal joint, difficulty in shoe wear and a cosmetically unaccep...

Presentation and options in management of avulsion fracture fibular head: A prospective study of rare entity

Introduction: Avulsion fracture of the fibular head is a rare entity. Significance of this entity is lies in association with injuries to the ligaments and neurovascular structures attached to it. Presentation of these i...

Outcome analysis of open fractures of the ankle joint

An open fracture presents with disruption of skin and underlying soft tissues results in a communication between the fracture and outside environment. In the treatment of open fractures, the objectives are to prevent inf...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP500239
  • DOI 10.22271/ortho.2017.v3.i3k.115
  • Views 108
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

KB Ravi1, Teddy Abraham Mathew, Madhusudan H (2017). A randomized controlled study of dynamic compression plate (DCP) versus limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) in treatment of forearm bone fractures in adults (age 18-60 years). International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences, 3(3), 765-773. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-500239