A Research on the Historical Course of Tanqīḥ al-Manāt in Imāmī Jurisprudence

Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2013, Vol 44, Issue 91

Abstract

Tanqīḥ al-manāṭ (refinement of the basis of the ruling) is the refining and elaborating of the reason and basis of a ruling of the redundant features along with decreeing and generalizing it to any case that enjoys a common feature. Tanqīḥ al-manāṭ was brought up first by the Sunnīs in the fifth/twelfth century and later on in the seventh/fortieth century was explicitly and formally raised among the Shī‘as. (However, implicit approaches to it had already been adopted, as well) This approach had later been more or less of interest to the jurists and they had made reference to it and talked about it, too.In this article, the approach of the jurists has been analyzed and explicated from the beginning up to the present in terms of the opinion and viewpoints in action and evidences in various periods. It is also clarified, in conclusion, that except one of the jurists for some justifiable reason, no body disagrees in general with the authenticity of tanqīḥ al-manāṭ and almost all accept the authenticity of the definite tanqīḥ al-manāṭ and that only some great scholars have restricted its authenticity to the non-devotional rulings. On the other hand, however, all the Imāmī jurists disagree with the presumptive (ẓannī) tanqīḥ al-manāṭ and only a few of the notable Imāmī scholars have regarded as valid the presumptive tanqīḥ al-manāṭ supported by lafẓ (term, wording) and some others have regarded as valid the confided tanqīḥ al-manāṭ.

Authors and Affiliations

Fā’Iza Malikī, MuḥAmmad ḤAsan Ḥā’Irī, MuḥAmmad Taqī Fakhla‘ī

Keywords

Related Articles

The Patterns of Goal-oriented Epistemology

The ancients, following Aristotle, used to classify sciences according to their subject criterion. This criterion had created such problems as non-comprehensiveness of all sciences and not achieving a comprehensive class...

Legal-Juridical Study of Conditional Option in Unilateral Obligation

In civil law, khiyārāt (options or rights of withdrawal) is a topic concerning contracts. Also, in article 456 of civil law, khiyār is viewed as related to transactions. In statuary jurisprudence and law, there is little...

Reappraising the Theory of Imposing Condition for Numerous Confessions in Proving Adultery

Adultery is proved only through numerous and frequent confessions (four times) and confession to less than that would not invoke legal punishment (ḥadd). This view is widely accepted by the Imāmī jurists. Among them, how...

Treatment with Muḥarramāt (Forbidden Things)

The jurists have since early times wondered whether illnesses can be treated with forbidden or ḥarām things and thereby improve the illness and restore the patients to health; or whether it is totally forbidden and imper...

An Approach to the Traditions on Taḥlīl and Negation of Liability to Khums Prior to Shī‘a Ownership

The principle of taḥlīl (making lawful) of khums is, in brief, indisputable. The ruling for taḥlīl of khums is issued by most of the Imams (A.S.). The object (muta‘allaq) of taḥlīl has been the same with all Imams (A.S.)...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP183803
  • DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.10925
  • Views 105
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Fā’Iza Malikī, MuḥAmmad ḤAsan Ḥā’Irī, MuḥAmmad Taqī Fakhla‘ī (2013). A Research on the Historical Course of Tanqīḥ al-Manāt in Imāmī Jurisprudence. فقه و اصول, 44(91), 143-169. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-183803