A Research on the Role of Ijtahād in Discernment of the Objects of Rulings

Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2009, Vol 41, Issue 82

Abstract

In the process of inferring legal rulings, as discussion about the ruling is essential, the discussion and examination of the "object of ruling" and what is involved in determining this object is also indispensable. The objects of rulings are specially varied and various elements are effective in their discernment. Among these elements, ijtahād (legal reasoning) has prompted widespread discussions. In the present research the role and degree of the impact of these elements on the discernment of the objects of rulings are discussed in two fields of conceptual discerning and proving applicability. This role in conceptual discerning is also followed up in three sections of plain, legally implied, and conventionally implied issues (questions). Of these three instances, ijtahād is involved only in legally implied issues. Concerning conventional topics, although the commonly used ijtahād is not exclusively involved, the jurist's expression of opinion is partially permissible and in some cases even essential. On the other hand, the commonly used ijtahād can not be regarded as an effective element in the stage of proving applicability (discernment of external issues).

Authors and Affiliations

Sayyid Ja‘Far Alawī GunāBāDī, MuḥAmmad Taqī Fakhla‘ī

Keywords

Related Articles

A Jurisprudential Research in Material Value and Ownership of News in Mass Media and the Rights Resulting from it

Information dissemination throughout the society is carried out by a phenomenon called news. This phenomenon is in relation to various social institutions as well as different aspects of people’s lives. In the present ar...

The maximum of dowry in Imamia jurisprudence

The increasing and unlimited cases of burdensome dowries beyond the husband's solvency, leading finally to the enforcement of dowry and divorce, had led some commentators to fix a certain maximum for dowry. The authors,...

The Role of Verity Proposition in Principles of Jurisprudence

The dynamism of the verity proposition has led to its being used in various issues and sciences as the founder for the general and constant principles. The principles of jurisprudence, as a science that is the founder fo...

Legal and Juridical Study of Qiṣāṣ through Donation of Organs

The applicability of executing the qiṣāṣ punishment through donation of organs is a novel topic and at the same time influential in safeguarding the blessings of human health and life. The legitimacy of this procedure re...

Examining the Principles of Legitimacy of the Nullifying Condition in Shī‘a Jurisprudence

A little deliberation on the contents of the contracts concluded between the real and legal persons reveals that nowadays the nullifying condition is gradually being included as one of the conditions of contracts. The le...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP183000
  • DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.3149
  • Views 84
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sayyid Ja‘Far Alawī GunāBāDī, MuḥAmmad Taqī Fakhla‘ī (2009). A Research on the Role of Ijtahād in Discernment of the Objects of Rulings. فقه و اصول, 41(82), 99-134. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-183000