A review of judicial powers in various schools for determining punishment

Journal Title: Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES) - Year 2015, Vol 6, Issue 1

Abstract

The principles of securing justice and individualizing punishment can be likened to two sides of the same coin, mutually justifying the simultaneous existence of each other. With regard to determination of punishment, on the one hand, the principle of equality and consistency of punishment lacks the required efficiency in that it does not consider the specific personal and social circumstances of the criminal in individual cases, and this condition would justify the imposition of equality of punishment; and on the other hand, the principle of securing justice is itself the foundation stone of individualizing punishment. No doubt, legislation of fixed punishments by legislators resulting from their mistrust of judges, which itself results in equal/unequal treatment of criminals, would completely destroy any chances of individualizing punishment. However, by setting forth minimum and maximum punishments and recognizing the right of a judge to apply mitigating or aggravating circumstances, to suspend or delay a punishment, to pardon or apply conditional release, and to impose additional punishment, legislators have actually provided a judge with a certain degree of freedom to issue sentences in accordance with the criminal’s specific characteristics as well as the specific circumstances of the crime. In this regard, Islamic Code of Punishment has taken steps to individualize punishment via considering limits for penalties (Taazirat) where particular importance is given to a judge’s insight, and via recognizing repentance as a way of mitigating punishment.

Authors and Affiliations

Atefeh Kousaripour, Mahmood Bavi, Siyavash Shjapourian

Keywords

Related Articles

Age structure and growth by otolith interpretation of Mullus surmuletusL. from the North-west Moroccan Mediterranean Coast

Age and growth of the striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) were studied by examination of growth increments within otoliths of 2033 specimens caught between March 2007 and February 2009 from the North-west Moroccan Med...

First record and host plants of Solenopsis Mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley, 1898 (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) from Iraq

The solenopsis mealybug, Phenacocus solenopsis (Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae) recorded as a new insect pest on ornamental plant Lantana camara (Verbeneceae) as well as other host plants for the first time in Iraq. Those i...

Flora, life form and chorology of plants in Rangelands watershed of Shirkooh of Yazd province, Iran

Land use and land transformation are mainly threated to biodiversity. Grazing as a land use is not incompatible with biodiversity conservation if proper management is applied. The conservation of plant diversity is a maj...

Effect of oil contamination on lead (Pb) concentration in muscle tissues of Otolithes ruber in Persian Gulf waters, Iran

In order to examine and compare Lead metal accumulation levels in muscle tissues of Otolithes ruber, sampling fish was done in both Bushehr and Asalouyeh stations during the summer 2013. After biometry of the samples,...

Ethnobotany of Nepenthes spp. in DayakSeberuang People, West Kalimantan, Indonesia

The aims of this research was to identify the use of Nepenthes spp. among DayakSeberuang People (DSP), West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Field research was conducted from January-October 2015 in three villages of DSP, namely...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP38180
  • DOI -
  • Views 127
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Atefeh Kousaripour, Mahmood Bavi, Siyavash Shjapourian (2015). A review of judicial powers in various schools for determining punishment. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES), 6(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-38180