A Search into the Ḥadīth, “Backbiting is more Severe than Adultery”
Journal Title: رهیافتهایی در علوم قرآن و حدیث - Year 2014, Vol 46, Issue 92
Abstract
The ḥadīth, “backbiting is more severe than adultery” (al-ghaybatu ashaddu min al-zinā), quoted from the Apostle of Allah (S.A.W.), by four of his companions: Abū Dhar al-Ghifārī, Abū Sa‘īd al-Khudrī, Jābir b. ‘Abd Allāh al-Anṣārī, and Anas b. al-Mālik is reported in the Shī‘ī and Sunnī sources – except for the Kutub al-‘Arba‘a and Ṣiḥāḥ al-Sitta. While analyzing and explaining the text of the ḥadīth, this article has tried to figure out whether or not the authenticity of the issuance of this ḥadīth of the Apostle of Allah (S.A.W.) can be verified through sanad (chain of transmission) and rijāl (scholars of ḥadīth) criteria. And if the answer is negative, what factors have caused its issuance. As for the text of ḥadīth, the important questions are: What is the reason for the severity of backbiting sin comparing adultery? Why should the person who has backbitten ask forgiveness from the person whom he has backbitten in order to be pardoned? That is because, if asking for forgiveness is done orally and face-to-face, then there is the possibility of giving rise to some disturbances such as losing one’s reputation or disputes and clashes. On the other hand, this process for forgiving backbiting has not been mentioned in the Holy Qur’ān and it is incompatible with other traditions that regard asking for God’s pardon (istighfār) as merely sufficient.
Authors and Affiliations
Mahdī JalāLī, MuḥSin Rajabī
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP197771
- DOI 10.22067/naqhs.v46i1.10892
- Views 161
- Downloads 0
Semantics of Myths in the Holy Qur’ān
One of the controversial issues concerning the Qur’ān in the contemporary era has been the claim of the existence of mythological stories in the Qur’ān. Primarily, Muḥammad Aḥmad Khalaf Allāh set forth this claim in his...
Reappraisal of the Ahl al-Bayt’s (A.S.) Esoteric Interpretations (Ta‘wīs) in Traditions of Nūr al-Thaqalayn Interpretation
A part of Ahl al-Bayt’s (A.S.) interpretation are their esoteric interpretations (ta’wīlī) traditions, which seem to be inconsistent with the current understanding of the verses of the Qur’ān. This part has since long ag...
An Introduction to the Philosophy of Qur’ānic Sciences
Raising epistemological discourses in the interdisciplinary science of philosophy have prompted various researchers of science to examine the general principles governing human sciences and knowledge from a different per...
Examining Methods of Critique of Ḥadīth in Ibn Abī al-Ḥadīd’s Sharḥ-i Nahj al-Balāgha
Ibn Abī al-Ḥadīd, as one of the commentators of Nahj al-Balāgha has tried in his commentaries to take into consideration one of the important principles of fiqh al-ḥadīth, i.e. critique of tradition. Having examined the...
Schleiermacher’s Model and the Interaction of the Textual and Circumstantial Contexts in Hermeneutic Circle Proportionate to the Qur’ān
This research is intended to present an elucidation of interaction between textual context and circumstantial context while comprehending the text. This interaction is maintained in a specific hermeneutic circle of compr...