A shocking experiment: New evidence on probability weighting and common ratio violations

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2007, Vol 2, Issue 4

Abstract

We study whether probability weighting is observed when individuals are presented with a series of choices between lotteries consisting of real non-monetary adverse outcomes, electric shocks. Our estimation of the parameters of the probability weighting function proposed by Tversky and Kahneman (1992) are similar to those obtained in previous studies of lottery choice for negative monetary payoffs and negative hypothetical payoffs. In addition, common ratio violations in choice behavior are widespread. Our results provide evidence that probability weighting is a general phenomenon, independent of the source of disutility.

Authors and Affiliations

Gregory S. Berns, C. Monica Capra, Sara Moore and Charles Noussair

Keywords

Related Articles

Exploring the time-saving bias: How drivers misestimate time saved when increasing speed

According to the time-saving bias, drivers underestimate the time saved when increasing from a low speed and overestimate the time saved when increasing from a relatively high speed. Previous research used a specific typ...

Sequential evidence accumulation in decision making: The individual desired level of confidence can explain the extent of information acquisition

Judgments and decisions under uncertainty are frequently linked to a prior sequential search for relevant information. In such cases, the subject has to decide when to stop the search for information. Evidence accumulati...

This way, please: Uncovering the directional effects of attribute translations on decision making

The translation of choice attributes into more meaningful information (e.g., from kWh to costs) is a form of choice architecture that is thought to facilitate decision making by providing decision signposts that activate...

The gambler’s fallacy in retrospect: A supplementary comment on Oppenheimer and Monin (2009)

Oppenheimer and Monin (2009) recently found that subjectively rare events are taken to indicate a longer preceding sequence of unobserved trials than subjectively common events, an effect which they refer to as the retro...

Does unconscious thought outperform conscious thought on complex decisions? A further examination

Two experiments examined the benefits of unconscious thought on complex decisions (Dijksterhuis, 2004). Experiment 1 attempted to replicate and extend past research by examining the effect of providing reasons prior to r...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677582
  • DOI -
  • Views 194
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Gregory S. Berns, C. Monica Capra, Sara Moore and Charles Noussair (2007). A shocking experiment: New evidence on probability weighting and common ratio violations. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(4), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677582