A Sketch of Deleuze’s Hermeneutical Spin
Journal Title: Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy - Year 2011, Vol 3, Issue 2
Abstract
The aim of this article is to sketch the procedural nature of the modus in which Deleuze reads the other philosophers. The hermeneutical problem indicated by the indecision to consider his books on different authors as an authorized interpretation or as fantasist utilization may be scattered if we understand his hermeneutical attempts both as interpretation and construction (concept or problem). In addition, this indecision affects the guild of Deleuzian exegetes in respect to the directory idea (prime author) which could point out the general strategy of his philosophy.
Authors and Affiliations
Emilian Margarit
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP150547
- DOI -
- Views 126
- Downloads 0
The Finitude of Existence in the Analytic of Dasein: The Intertwining of Understanding and Affection
In this paper, I will discuss the Heideggerian interpretation of death in relation with two fundamental structures of the existential analysis: understanding (Verstehen) and state-of-mind (Befindlichkeit). In the first p...
The Problem of Truth in Heidegger’s Being and Time
The aim of the present paper is to analyse the way in which Heidegger’s work Being and Time is based on the relationship between four concepts with methodological function: phenomenon, logos, interpretation (Auslegung),...
Le mouvement ou la chair : deux conceptions de la profondeur ontologique selon Patočka et Merleau-Ponty
Both Patočka and Merleau-Ponty conceive the world not just as an Object, but rather as a field of an irreducible phenomenal and ontological depth. Patočka’s concept of movement and Merleau-Ponty’s concept of flesh are tw...
The movement or the flesh: two conceptions of the ontological depth by Patočka and Merleau-Ponty
Both Patočka and Merleau-Ponty conceive the world not just as an Object, but rather as a field of an irreducible phenomenal and ontological depth. Patočka’s concept of movement and Merleau-Ponty’s concept of flesh are tw...
Mission Impossible? Thinking What Must be Thought in Heidegger and Deleuze
In this paper, I discuss and compare the (im)possibility of thinking that which is most worth our thought in Deleuze’s What Is Philosophy? (1994) and Heidegger’s course lectures in What Is Called Thinking? (2004). Both a...