A study of barriers of by cervical cancers screening among nursing professionals at tertiary health care center

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Gynaecology - Year 2019, Vol 10, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is an important public health problem. Globally, cancer cervix is one of the commonest cancers among women, with an estimate of 468000 new cases annually and 80% of these cases occur in developing and underdeveloped countries.Aims and Objectives:To study barriers of by cervical cancers screening among nursing professionals at tertiary health care center. Methodology: The present study was conducted in KLES Dr.Prabhakar Kore Hospital and Medical Research Centre and District Hospital Belgaum during the period ofJanuary 2010 to December 2010. The present study consisted of 400 participants done by convenient sampling. Female nursing working at KLES Dr.Prabhakar Kore Hospital and Medical Research Centre and District Hospital Belgaum. Group A (Consisted of female nurses working at KLES Dr.Prabhakar Kore Hospital and Medical Research Centre and District Hospital Belgaum) and Group B (consisted of female nurses working at District Hospital, Belgaum). The data obtained was tabulated and analyzed using rates, rations and percentages. Results:In this studywe have seenmost of the participants had age between 25 to 35 years (72% in group A and in group B).In this study most of the participants in both the groups indicated lack of awareness as the commonest barrier (49% vs 52%) . The other barrier were a feeling discomfortPelvic examination 16.0and 14.0; Male doctor1.5and 3.0; Fear of pain4.0and 0.5; Fear of test result8.5and 5.5; Feeling that women with complaints should undergo cervical cancer screening 20.0and 14.0; Time / financial constraint5.0and11.0respectively in group A and B. Conclusion:In our study the most important barriers for the screening for cervical cancer werelack of awareness as the commonest barrier feeling discomfortPelvic examination,Male doctor, Fear of pain, Fear of test result, no any complaints, Time / financial constraint if these barriers are studied and implemented to encourage for screening tothe women in reproductive age group

Authors and Affiliations

Nandan Purandare

Keywords

Related Articles

Audit of perinatal mortality in a tertiary care centre

Background: Perinatal mortality was observed in less than 10 per 1000 births in developed countries, In India, 32-35 per 1000 perinatal deaths were observed. The most common cause of perinatal mortality is preterm birth,...

Study of antenatal and intrapartum risk factors associated with meconium stained amniotic fluid

Background: Meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality among newborns in the developing world. Meconium stained infants are considered 100 times more likely to develop MAS, compar...

A study of factors associated with post partum haemorrhage and it’s management at tertiary health care centre

Background: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis and management of PPH will improve the outcome of delivery. Aim and objective: To study factors ass...

Perinatal and maternal mortality and morbidity in eclampsia

Background: Eclampsia is a severe complication of preeclampsia. It’s a rare but serious condition where high blood pressure results in seizures during pregnancy. Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate and reduce the m...

A study factors associated and outcome of oligohydramnios at tertiary health care centre

Background: The amniotic fluid (AF) is a part of the baby’s life support system. It aids in the development of muscles, limbs, lungs and digestive system. Amniotic fluid is produced soon after the amniotic sac is formed...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP615039
  • DOI 10.26611/10121029
  • Views 160
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Nandan Purandare (2019). A study of barriers of by cervical cancers screening among nursing professionals at tertiary health care center. Medpulse International Journal of Gynaecology, 10(2), 59-61. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-615039