A Study Of Comparison Of 0.8mg Vs 1.4mg Of Intrathecal Nalbuphine In 3.5ml Of Inj. Bupivacaine Heavy 0.5% In Lower Abdominal And Lower Limb Surgeries
Journal Title: International Journal of Anesthesiology & Research (IJAR) - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 3
Abstract
Background: Spinal anaesthesia is a commonly employed technique which provides safe, effective, low cost surgical anesthesia with good post-operative analgesia. Nalbuphine is a semi synthetic opioid with mixed antagonist and k agonist properties. In present study we have compared 0.8mg vs 1.4mg of Intrathecal inj. Nalbuphine with inj. bupivacaine heavy 0.5% 3.5cc to determine the most optimal dose for effective anaesthesia and maximum postoperative analgesia in lower abdominal surgeries. We also observed about the common side effects that occur with opioids like, pruritus, nausea, vomiting, sedation. Material and Methods: Patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 30 participants each. They received either nalbuphine 0.8 mg (group A) or nalbuphine 1.4 mg (group B) diluted upto 0.5ml with normal saline, mixed with 17.5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (3.5 ml). The onset of sensory blockade, onset of motor blockage, duration of sensory blockade, two-segment regression time from highest level of sensory blockade and duration of motor blockade were recorded following procedure. Results: In this study, we found that intrathecal injection Nalbuphine combined with intrathecal bupivacaine provides faster onset of sensory and motor blockage along with intraoperative hemodynamic stability. Addition of 1.4 mg intrathecal Nalbuphine in comparison with 0.8 mg provides better postoperative analgesia. The duration of sensory and motor blockade were increased without significantly increasing the incidence of side effects such as sedation, pruritus, nausea/vomiting and respiratory depression. Conclusion: In conclusion, Intrathecal Nalbuphine (1.4mg) added to Intrathecal Bupivacaine 0.5% heavy (17.5mg) provides prolonged postoperative analgesia without increasing risk of side effects. Further studies are required to determine optimal dosage of intrathecal Nalbuphine.
Authors and Affiliations
Shridhar Ekbote,
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP516801
- DOI 10.19070/2332-2780-18000103
- Views 62
- Downloads 0
Patient Transfer Unit: Clinical Experience On Medical Evacuation In North-East
Patient Transport unit (PTU) and its team CCATT (Critical Care Air transport Team) has been operating as a savior of north-east since 2008. It is an indigenously developed, stretcher modified unit. It houses the essentia...
Sedoanalgesia Administration with Propofol and Ketamine for Minor Urologic Interventions
Aim: In this study we aimed to administer sedoanalgesia with propofol and ketamine combination in patients undergoing planned minor urologic interventions with limited anesthesia. By combining these two medications, lowe...
Anaesthesia and Analgesia Methods Applied in Thoracic Surgery
Aim: To determine the anaesthesia and analgesia methods applied in thoracic surgery in our clinic and to evaluate these with current literature. Method: A retrospective evaluation was made of patients who underwent surg...
Innovations in Anesthesia: Past, Present, and Future
Innovations in Anesthesia: Past, Present, and Future
Emergence Delirium: Revisiting A Clinical Enigma
Delirium seems to result from the interaction between pre-operative patient vulnerabilities and exposure to precipitating factors. Postoperative delirium (POD) is often observed in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic...