A study of open versus laparoscopic removal of appendix at tertiary health care center

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Dentistry - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

Background: laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has struggled to prove its superiority over the open technique. This is in contrast to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which has promptly become the gold standard for gallstone disease despite little scientific challenge. Aims and Objectives: To Study Open versus Laparoscopic removal of appendix at tertiary health care Center. Methodology: This was a hospital based cross-sectional study carried out in the department surgery during the one year period i.e. January 2016 to January 2016. during one year there were 70 cases selected for study in that 35 each randomly allotted to Laparoscopy and 35 to open operation group. The statistical analyses was done by Chi – square test, unpaired t-test calculated by SPSS 19 version software. Result: In our study we have found that the majority of the patients were in the age group of 20-30 i.e. 40.00% followed by 10-20 were 24.29%, 30-40 were 18.57%, 50-60 were 12.86%, >60 were 4.29% respectively. The majority of the patients were Male i.e. 67.14% and female were 32.86%. The duration of surgery was significantly higher for Laparoscopy as compared to Open (X2=11.43, df=4, p<0.05). The post operative parameters like Post-operative pain (VAS- Score ) (mean ±SD)- 5.43 ± 5.62, 7.34 ± 3.4 (t=2.07,df=68,p<0.04 ) ; Post operative hospital stay (mean ±SD)- 2.21 ± 1.42, 5.78 ±2.41 (t=2.07,df=68,p<0.04 ) ; Postoperative duration to return work - 5.67 ± 2.12, 15.62 ± 3.4. ( t=5.12,df=68, p<0.001). The most of the complications like Vomiting i.e. 11.43% as compared to 20%, Abdominal abscess -2.86%, 14.29; Wound infection -2.86, 8.57; Ileus -0.00, 5.71 in Laparoscopy as compared to Open surgery respectively. (p<0.05). Conclusion: Except the duration of surgery in all other perspective like Post-operative pain. Post operative hospital stay, Post-operative duration to return work and less complications like Vomiting, Abdominal abscess, Wound infection, Ileus ; laparoscopy was superior to open laprotomy for the removal or appendix.

Authors and Affiliations

Bhaskar Jadhav

Keywords

Related Articles

A Study of Various Indication of Caesarian Section in Primiparous Patients

Abstract: Introduction: The indications for cesarean section in primiparous patients are changing day-to-day and newer indications are being added to it. This is because in modern obstetrics with the increasing amenities...

Effect of location of fracture line and surgically visible nerve entrapment in recovery of infraorbital nerve following zygomatico-maxillary complex fracture- A prospective study

Background: In zygomatico-maxillary complex fracture infraorbital nerve is commonly affected due to its course in infraorbital canal and vacation at infraorbital foramen. This may result in temporary or permanent neurose...

Study of changes in clinical profile of diatric HIV patients after institution of HAART

Introduction: The clinical manifestations of HIV-infection in children are different from those in adults. Even the pattern of opportunistic infections in children is different from those in adults. Children tend to suff...

Odontogenic cysts in tertiary care institute: Its prevalence and characteristics

Background: Odontogenic cysts are the most common form of cystic lesions that affect the maxillofacial region. They are classified traditionally into a developmental group, including keratocysts and dentigerous cysts, an...

Anaesthetic management of a case of suspected myopathy posted for emergency appendicectomy

Introduction: Rarely we encounter patients with myopathic disorders for emergency surgeries where actual diagnosis is not known and there is no time for evaluation. We are describing the anaesthetic management of a femal...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP365612
  • DOI -
  • Views 124
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Bhaskar Jadhav (2018). A study of open versus laparoscopic removal of appendix at tertiary health care center. Medpulse International Journal of Dentistry, 5(1), 27-29. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-365612