A study to compare the effects of supraclavicular perivascular technique and infraclavicular brachial plexus blockade for below elbow surgeries

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology - Year 2018, Vol 8, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: The brachial plexus provides the motor innervations and nearly all the sensory supply of the upper limb. Supraclavicular block is one of the most widely used techniques of brachial plexus block. At the lateral border of the anterior scalene muscles the brachial plexus passes down between the first rib and clavicle to enter the axilla. Objective: To compare the efficacy of supraclavicular perivascular technique and vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block, using nerve locator for below elbow surgeries. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective randomized study conducted at Chengalpattu Medical College and Hospital, Chengalpattu. Eighty patients of ASAgrade I or II of either sex undergoing below elbow surgeries (mostlyorthopedicandplastic surgeries) were randomly allocated into group S andgroup I. Each group comprises of 40 patients. Surgery was done undervertical Infraclavicular approach of Brachial plexus Block in Group I andunder Supraclavicular perivascular approach of Brachial plexus block inGroupS.Results: In our study, the mean age of patients in Group S was 33.52 years and in group I it was 32.88 years The mean weight of patients in both the groups S and I was 58.1 and 58.62 respectively. The total duration of motor Blockade was found to be 464.1 min in Group S and 452.5 in group I The post-operative analgesia time was also found to be not significant between the two groups with mean time of 429.49 in group S and 414 in group I. Conclusion: From our study it is inferred that nerve locator guided Infraclavicular block of brachial plexus is similar to nerve locator guided supraclavicular block in the form of ease of technique, onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade and on complication rate.

Authors and Affiliations

E Shamugavali, Ezhil Raja

Keywords

Related Articles

Clonidineasanadjuvanttoropivacaine(0.5%)insupraclavicularbrachialplexusblock

BackgroundandAim:Supraclavicularapproachforbrachialplexusblockhasrapidonsetandprovidescompleteandpredictableanesthesiaforentireupperextremityandparticularly,handsurgery.Inthisstudy,weobservedtheefficacyandsafetyofclonidi...

Correlation between arterial and end tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure during laparoscopic surgeries

Background: End-tidal carbon dioxide pressure (etCO2) monitoring is used as an indirect measure of arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2). To prevent hypercapnia, close intraoperative monitoring of etCO2 or PaC...

Facilitatory effects of IV dexmedetomidine on spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery involving lower limb

Background: Spinal anaesthesia is at low cost, a surgery of up to two hours duration can be performed.The greatest challenge of the technique is to control the spread of the local anaesthetic through the cerebrospinal fl...

Comparative study of dexmedetomidine and clonidine along with ropivacaine in epidural anaesthesia for vaginal hysterectomy

Background: The present randomized double blind prospective study was carried out for Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Clonidine along with Ropivacaine in epidural anaesthesia for vaginal hysterectomy. Methods: 60 femal...

Evaluation of the hemodynamic effect of bupivacaine wound instillation in modified radical mastectomy

Background and aim: Breast cancerare a leading cause of cancer death among women. Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) is the commonest surgery done for operable breast malignancies. Majority of operated patients will exper...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP449536
  • DOI 10.26611/1015821
  • Views 167
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

E Shamugavali, Ezhil Raja (2018). A study to compare the effects of supraclavicular perivascular technique and infraclavicular brachial plexus blockade for below elbow surgeries. Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology, 8(2), 61-64. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-449536