Accordance of breves of art. 66 and p. 1 of art. 68 of Constitution of Ukraine with theory of implementation of legal norms: pros and cons
Journal Title: Naukovyy Visnyk Dnipropetrovs'kogo Derzhavnogo Universytety Vnutrishnikh Sprav - Year 2017, Vol 1, Issue 1
Abstract
While processing this paper the author put an aim to evaluate pros and cons concerning accordance of the normative and legal breves of the art. 66 and p. 1 of the art. 68 of the Constitution of Ukraine with the generally known in domestic legal doctrine provision of the theory of legal norms implementation and also to prepare suggestions as to amending these articles of the main law of our state. The analysis of the following definitions of the general and theoretical categories as «legal norms implementation», «legal norms use», «legal norms fulfillment» and «legal norms abidance» allows the author to distinguish general functional regularity that is a connection objectively existing between different by their breves’ character legal norms, forms of their direct implementation and varieties of lawful behavior of subjects by the character of their act. This regularity may be reflected as the following judgments: 1) authorizing legal norms that fix subjective legal rights, are put into practice in the form of the use by a person of his/her possibilities by means of his/her active lawful behavior (activity); 2) binding legal norms, entrusting a person with an obligation, are put into practice in the form of fulfillment by him/her subjective legal obligations by means of active lawful behavior (activity); 3) forbidding legal norms containing prohibitions are put into practice by a person in the form of their abidance by means of passive lawful behavior (inaction). Considering these theoretical provisions the author came to the following conclusion: judgments of Rabinovich as to that that any forbidding norm can be formulated as a binding norm and contrariwise any legal duty may be reformulated as a prohibition and also the conclusion of the scientist as to spreading of the commented breve not only to forbidding but also to binding legal norms witnesses about at least insufficient technical and legal perfection of normative and legal breves, fixed in art. 66 and p. 1 of art. 68 of the Constitution of Ukraine and also about the necessity to correct them basing on aforementioned provisions of the theory of legal norms implementation. With this aim the following changes and amendments to articles 66 and 68 of the Constitution of Ukraine are suggested: “Article 66. Infliction of harm to nature and cultural heritage is prohibited. Each person in case of infliction harm to nature or cultural heritage must repay inflicted harm”; “Article 68. Everyone must fulfill duties, entrusted by the Constitution of Ukraine and laws of Ukraine. Encroachment on rights and freedoms, honor and dignity of other people is prohibited. Ignorance of laws does not release from legal liability”.
Authors and Affiliations
Ihor Serdyuk
Normative-legal regulation of forms of combat and service activity of National police departments of Ukraine: problem resolution
The article, based on the analysis of theoretical principles and normative-legal framework that regulates the service-fighting activity of the law enforcement forces, considers the object, subject and the main tasks of t...
Reflections on Hannah Arendt’s “the perplexities of the rights of man”, the problem of a refugee and the problem of a state of exception
This short analysis aims at giving certain insights on the correlation among the concepts and together phenomena of ‘human rights’, ‘refugee’, ‘state of exception/emergency’, and also ‘modern state’ and, finally, ‘law’ i...
Essencial characteristic of sources of law in administrative procedure
The article deals with the pressing questions of sources of right in the administrative rule-making. In the article an author is analyse the scientific going near understanding of sources of right, that was folded in le...
Criminalistic characteristics of the person who involves the chair of objects of the citizen's real estate
Criminologically significant features of the person who is committing fraud in relation to objects of real estate are investigated. The forensic portrait of the offender is considered on the basis of socio-demographic, m...
Defining components of the doctrine of the minimum level of cruelty as a criterion for distinguishing between torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
. The article deals with types of treatment/punishment prohibited by the article 3 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. European Court of Human Rights’ practice is analy...