Admissibility of the most favoured clauses (MFNs) on booking platforms in competition law
Journal Title: Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem - Year 2016, Vol 8, Issue 4
Abstract
MFN clauses are often applied on platform markets, through which the seller is obliged to offer its products on a platform under the best conditions. From the competition law perspective these clauses are controversial. In the past, courts have classified such clauses as restrictive vertical agreements which abused dominant position on the relevant market. Based on such decisions, the following articlehighlights the competitive economic impact as well as the competitive admissibility of these clauses.<br/><br/>
Authors and Affiliations
Rstislav Funta
[b]Refusal to Deal as an Abuse of Dominant Position[/b]
As a rule companies are free to decide where and when they will sell their products and with which companies or clients they are prepared to contract. Such freedom is not unlimited and a dominant company which refuses to...
[i][b]Industrial Property vs. Intellectual Property[/b][/i]
Nowadays, the role of industrial property and intellectual property is becoming increasingly more significant. This is mainly the result of industrial development and the development of means of communication, which faci...
Edukacja prawnicza w poglądach Jerzego Wróblewskiego
Publikacja ma na celu przypomnienie poglądów Jerzego Wróblewskiego na zagadnienia związane z edukacją prawniczą, a także przedstawienie wyników krótkiego sondażu z 2011 roku przeprowadzonego na podstawie tych samych pyta...
[b]The Problem of Allowing for the Cost of Representation as a Legitimate Business Expense[/b]
In this article the author argues the case that businesses should have the right to include the cost of representation as an allowable and legitimate business expense. The cost of representation is, both necessary for th...
[b][i]Inequality of Imprisonment in Europe. The Polish Perspective[/i][/b]