Alfuzosin versus Tamsulozin in the Treatment of Patients with Distal Ureteral Calculus - Prospective, Randomised, Comparative Study

Journal Title: Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research - Year 2017, Vol 5, Issue 10

Abstract

Introduction: Ureteral calculus 4mm or smaller will usually pass spontaneously. Conservative medical treatment to be applied first. The simple waiting approach may result in complication. So, the simple watchful waiting approach is extended by pharmacotherapy. The drugs used as medical expulsive therapy are calcium channel blockers, alpha blockers, corticosteroids. Aim: We evaluated and compared the efficacy of Tamsulozin and Alfusozin in the medical treatment of symptomatic uncomplicated distal ureteric calculus. Materials and Methods: A total of 150 patients with distal ureteric calculus of ≤ 10mm were randomly divided into 3 groups. Group A patients ( n=50) received placebo ,Group B patients (n=50)received Tamsulozin 0.4mg/day, Group C patients (n=50) received Alfuzosin 10mg/day. All patients received Diclofenac sodium 50 mg on demand. Follow up was done on weekly basis for30 days. Results: The mean calculus size was comparable in the 3 groups (6.98±1.6mm, 6.34±1.7mm, 6.7±1.5mm, respectively). The calculus expulsion rate was 32%, 72%, 74%. A statistically significant difference was noted between group A and B(p=0.00006) and between A and C (p=0.00003), whereas no significant difference between Band C. The mean calculus expulsion time was(8.63±3.24, 7.75±3.14, 8.57±4,52days respectively). There was no statistical difference was observed between the groups( p=0.5961).The analgesic requirement was 6.60± 1.82 doses in group A, 3.86± 2.51doses in group B, and 4.18±3.02 in group C. Analgesic requirement was more in group A than in group B and C. No severe complications which require suspension of therapy due to drugs were found (2 patients retrograde ejaculation in group B , few days of dizziness 1 patient in group C). Conclusion: The use of Tamsulozin or Alfusozin as medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteric calculus proved to be safe and effective. Moreover, alfusozin did not have any significant benefit over tamsulozin.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr V. Ravi

Keywords

Related Articles

A Prospective Study to Evaluate Cardiac Functional Status in Permanent Pacemaker Implanted Patients at a Tertiary Care Centre

Our study aimed at finding the incidence of overt heart failure or asymptomatic left ventricular systolic/diastolic dysfunction and cardiac dyssynchrony in patients undergoing single or dual chamber cardiac pacing and it...

Health Status of Traffic Police Personnel: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Traffic policemen are one of the most vulnerable groups to various illnesses as they are exposed to dust, noise, fumes, ultra-violet radiation during their work. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted...

Diagnosis of Pneumonia in Children with Severe Acute Malnutrition, Validation of WHO Recommended Criteria and Pulse-Oximetry

Aim: To find incidence of clinical pneumonia viz a viz radiologically confirmed pneumonia in children with severe acute malnutrition. Materials and Methods: It was a hospital based prospective analytical study carried ou...

A Study of Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy: 30 Cases

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy is an innovative laparoscopic technique which aims to reduce the number of traditional multiple port entries. However, this is a technically challenging surgery which requires pe...

Outcome of Autologous Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) Transplantation in Patient with Spinal Cord Injury: Our experiences

Introduction: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a severe neurological disorder following trauma. Complete spinal cord injury ASIA Grade A with quadriplegia / paraplegia patients remains untreated and neglected in our country s...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP528674
  • DOI -
  • Views 72
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr V. Ravi (2017). Alfuzosin versus Tamsulozin in the Treatment of Patients with Distal Ureteral Calculus - Prospective, Randomised, Comparative Study. Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research, 5(10), 28751-28755. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-528674