Aligning Practice, Policy and Education with Evidence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Journal Title: Online Journal of Complementary & Alternative Medicine (OJCAM) - Year 2019, Vol 1, Issue 3
Abstract
Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) is commonly used Harris PE, et al [1], but its outcomes are mixed. For example, some prevention remedies such as Echinacea for secondary prevention of common colds have not been shown to be effective [2]. And some treatment interventions such as actual (compared to simulation) acupuncture for alleviation of some types of chronic pain have been shown to be effective [3,4]. The endorsement of CAM as such – by practicing clinicians and others supporting health care such as policy makers and health educators – when it is not rigorously shown to be more effective than placebo or sham/simulation care, is arguably unethical, as has been demonstrated to be the case with orthomolecular psychiatry [5]. Such endorsement of CAM should thus be addressed from a practice, policy and education perspective. From a practice perspective, no CAM should be provided (nor offered) by clinicians if there is no robust evidence supporting its effectiveness (and safety) compared to one or more effective (and safe) active interventions. Such independently replicated evidence requires multiple randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis or comparable research such as well-matched quasi-experimental studies and systematic reviewing. From a policy perspective, no CAM should be publicly funded if there is no robust evidence supporting its effectiveness (and safety); robust evidence supporting cost-effectiveness of CAM should be a preference rather than a requirement, as in various clinical situations, such as life threatening health challenges, cost considerations can be viewed as having secondary or marginal importance. And from an education perspective, no CAM should be taught to clinicians (nor arguably messaged to the general public) if there is no robust evidence supporting its effectiveness (and safety). Thus, aligning practice, policy and education with (robust) evidence is crucial for the ethics of CAM.
Authors and Affiliations
Abraham Rudnick
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP675282
- DOI 10.33552/OJCAM.2019.01.000513
- Views 75
- Downloads 0
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders Among Syrian Refugees in Za’atari Camp – Jordan
Now a days war distributed everywhere related to political, financial, race, religion and other many issues; as usual during and after every war there are many harmful result’s affect people who experience it, one of the...
Facilitating Spiritual Care for Whole Person Patient- Centered Care
Spirituality is at the core of the person. When nurses care for the whole person, all domains of the person need to be addressed, including the spiritual [1,2]. There is a significant amount of research that indicates th...
Mind-Body Wellness Project: An Exemplar Case
A growing body of literature concerning the inherent stresses of nursing and medical education report especially high stress levels, in some cases higher than those students in other health professions. Nursing students...
From Toxins to Drugs: Chemistry and Pharmacology of Animal Venom and other Secretions
Animal secretions are currently proving more than before to be one of the best sources of drugs for current and future health complications. Well managed and optimized, their chemical compounds can as well be used to pre...
Role of Traditional & Religious Leaders in Stigma Reduction
I bring to your attention an issue in mental health that gets scarce attention in the peer- reviewed literature: the use of traditional and religious healing in mental health. Funding for mental health services and conse...