Aligning Practice, Policy and Education with Evidence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Abstract

Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) is commonly used Harris PE, et al [1], but its outcomes are mixed. For example, some prevention remedies such as Echinacea for secondary prevention of common colds have not been shown to be effective [2]. And some treatment interventions such as actual (compared to simulation) acupuncture for alleviation of some types of chronic pain have been shown to be effective [3,4]. The endorsement of CAM as such – by practicing clinicians and others supporting health care such as policy makers and health educators – when it is not rigorously shown to be more effective than placebo or sham/simulation care, is arguably unethical, as has been demonstrated to be the case with orthomolecular psychiatry [5]. Such endorsement of CAM should thus be addressed from a practice, policy and education perspective. From a practice perspective, no CAM should be provided (nor offered) by clinicians if there is no robust evidence supporting its effectiveness (and safety) compared to one or more effective (and safe) active interventions. Such independently replicated evidence requires multiple randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis or comparable research such as well-matched quasi-experimental studies and systematic reviewing. From a policy perspective, no CAM should be publicly funded if there is no robust evidence supporting its effectiveness (and safety); robust evidence supporting cost-effectiveness of CAM should be a preference rather than a requirement, as in various clinical situations, such as life threatening health challenges, cost considerations can be viewed as having secondary or marginal importance. And from an education perspective, no CAM should be taught to clinicians (nor arguably messaged to the general public) if there is no robust evidence supporting its effectiveness (and safety). Thus, aligning practice, policy and education with (robust) evidence is crucial for the ethics of CAM.

Authors and Affiliations

Abraham Rudnick

Keywords

Related Articles

Caring for Dying Children in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Nurses and Parent’s Perspective

Caring for dying children is complex and requires coordination of all resources. In PICU the main objective is to save lives and ensure vital functions in critically ill children. However due to the child’s critical and...

Case Study of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD)

Background: This document pertains of idiographic research; the case study of Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The objective of this case study was to reaffirm the efficacy of Fear-Stimuli Identification Therapy (FSI...

Fasting

In Nepal, five hours from Katmandu, in the middle of the forest, people come to meditate and pray in front of young Yogi. 24 hours a day, this young man sits in the hollow of a tree, in full meditation. He does not move,...

Nutraceuptides: Perspectives into the Future of Supplementary Food Sciences and Therapeutic Technology

Animal venom peptides, pharmaceuticals and nutrients from natural products are currently playing a significant role in both preventing and managing health and its complications worldwide. The term “Nutraceuticals” was fi...

Sijunzi Tang, Codonopsis Pilosula Polysaccharide and Saccharomyces Boulardii Modulate the Gut Microbiome to Alleviate Dss-Induced Colitis in Mice

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is usually considered to be more frequent in Western countries, but now a recent increase in the incidence and prevalence has been observed in China. Chinese herbal medicine as the main e...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP675282
  • DOI 10.33552/OJCAM.2019.01.000513
  • Views 60
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Abraham Rudnick (2019). Aligning Practice, Policy and Education with Evidence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Online Journal of Complementary & Alternative Medicine (OJCAM), 1(3), 1-1. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-675282