An Alternative to Angle ANB in the Assessment of Sagittal Discrepancy: A Case for W angle, M-axis and G-axis based on a Secondary Analysis of Clinical Trial Data

Journal Title: International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Science (IJDOS) - Year 2015, Vol 0, Issue 4

Abstract

Introduction: The objective was to test if W angle was a superior method of measuring skeletal change over angle ANB. The design was to re-analyse the results of a previously performed prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial with two parallel groups. The setting was the Orthodontic department, Royal Preston District General Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom. Method: The participants were 26 patients randomly selected from a previous trial, aged 9-17 years undergoing treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion (ANB > 5˚, OJ > 6mm). The intervention was two alternative designs of Twin-block appliance, allocated randomly. One with a Southend clasp on the upper and lower central incisors and one without. The appliances were identical in all other aspects. The outcome measured was the skeletal and dental changes from lateral cephalometric radiographs before and after treatment. Randomization was accomplished using a computer generated sequence. Allocation concealment was achieved with sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Blinding was applicable to outcome assessment only. Results: Based on a power calculation for W angle, 26 patients were randomly selected from 41 in the original trial. 13 patients were analysed in the Southend group and 13 in the Non-Southend group. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups and the trial status is completed. No harms were observed as a result of treatment. There was a statistically significant change in W angle in the Southend group (5.4˚) and the Non-Southend group (2.8˚) (p=0.000). This was greater than that for angle ANB in the Southend group (-3.5˚) and Non-Southend group (-2.6˚) (p=0.004). There was a 2.6˚ difference in treatment change between the Southend and Non-Southend groups for W angle but only 0.9˚ for angle ANB. There was a total reduction to class I normative values for W angle (54.4˚ Southend, 52.2˚ Non-Southend group, norm 51-56˚). This was not so for angle ANB (3.9˚ Southend, 4.5˚ Non-Southend, norm 2.0-2.5˚). Conclusions: The elimination of confounding factors that influence angle ANB especially change in incisor angulation meant that W angle demonstrated a greater differentiation of skeletal response both within and between the Southend and Non-Southend groups. M-axis and G-axis are stable with growth and unchanged by treatment.

Authors and Affiliations

M. J Trenouth

Keywords

Related Articles

A Cephalometric Evaluation of Oropharyngeal Airway Changes Duing Twin-Block Appliance Treatment

Introduction: The research hypothesis under test was that functional orthopaedic treatment with the Twin-block appliance increases the oropharyngeal airway as well as correcting the jaw relationships in class II division...

Vertical Facial Height and its Correlation with Skeletal Pattern Among Young Nigerian Orthodontic Patients

Objectives: To compare the anterior facial height parameters among the sexes and to find facial height variations among Class I, II and III skeletal pattern groups. Methods: The sample comprised of 60 (26 females and 34...

Evaluation of the Erosive Effect of Chewing Aspocid versus its Soluble Form on Micro Hardness of Primary Teeth Enamel in Heart Disease Children. (In Vitro-Study)

Background: Aspocid 75 mg chewing tablets (pH = 3) is the usual drug used in children with heart disease, this acidic medicine is available in Egyptian markets and accessible by the public. This may lead to increase thei...

Prevalence Of Different Types Of Malocclusion Among School Children In Makkah Governorate of Saudi Arabia

The purpose of this study was to assess the status of occlusion among school children in Makkah governorate of Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: The sampling included 289 adolescents with age range 14-17 years. The sa...

CBCT Variants of Sinonasal Cavity: What Oral and Maxillofacial Radiologists Need to Know

This educational review highlighted the common sinonasal variations with reference to their clinical implications. Some variations can appear as well-demarcated radiolucency on routine imaging leading to a possible misdi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP201162
  • DOI 10.19070/2377- 8075-SI04001
  • Views 124
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

M. J Trenouth (2015). An Alternative to Angle ANB in the Assessment of Sagittal Discrepancy: A Case for W angle, M-axis and G-axis based on a Secondary Analysis of Clinical Trial Data. International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Science (IJDOS), 0(4), 1-9. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-201162