An Analysis of the Theory of Justice against the Standard of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt in the Judge's Decision in the Jessica Kumala Wongso Case

Abstract

This research aims to find out the theory of justice that can be used by judges in proving criminal cases in Indonesia and the use of the theory of justice in the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt in the judge's decision in the Jessica Kumala Wongso case. This research uses normative legal research methods with legal philosophy, legislation and conceptual approaches. The data source used is secondary data consisting of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials analyzed qualitatively with deductive inference, starting with general principles and concepts about the theory of justice and the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt, the analysis moves towards specific propositions to determine the value of justice and the relevance of this standard in the judge's decision in the Jessica Kumala Wongso case. The study found that Gustav Radbruch's theory of justice can be applied by judges in Indonesian criminal cases, using six evidentiary parameters: theory of evidence, minimum evidence, evidence, presentation of evidence, burden of proof, and strength of proof. These parameters reflect Radbruch's legal values of justice, purpose, and legal certainty. Judges using Radbruch's theory prioritize justice, followed by purpose and legal certainty. In Jessica's case, despite doubts about the evidence, the judges found her guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, aligning with Radbruch's principle that justice should take precedence in the standard of proof.

Authors and Affiliations

Jayanto Timbang, Aloysius Wisnubroto, Hyronimus Rhiti

Keywords

Related Articles

Customer Satisfaction in the South Denpasar Region as a Measure of Brand Loyalty and the Impact of Product Quality and Image

Companies need to pay attention to the high consumption of consumers or customers to be more innovative to meet customer needs and desires with quality products or services created for the long term so that customers wil...

Relationship between Age, Employment Status, and Availability of Sports Infrastructure on Motivation to Exercise in Yogyakarta State University Education Personnel

This research aims to determine: (1) the correlation between age and motivation for doing sports, (2) the correlation between the employment status and motivation for doing sports, (3) the correlation between the availab...

The Defense Policy of King Gia Long on Vietnam’s Southwestern Border Region (1802-1820)

After reuniting the nation in 1802, King Gia Long set out to build, develop and protect it. King Gia Long was particularly interested in the defense of the southwestern border area due to its geo-strategic location and s...

Cognitive Parameters Influencing Job Satisfaction among School Teachers: A Qualitative Exploration

This research paper presents a qualitative exploration of cognitive parameters influencing job satisfaction among school teachers, with a focus on cognitive practice/cognitive exercise, cognitive activity, cognitive eval...

Effect of Corporate Governance on Financial Distress: Evidence from Listed Firms at Ghana Stock Exchange

This study was conducted to determine the effect of corporate governance on financial distress of listed firms at Ghana Stock Exchange (GSE) using panel data from 2015 to 2019. Specifically, the study focusses on: The ef...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP745121
  • DOI 10.47191/ijmra/v7-i09-34
  • Views 55
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jayanto Timbang, Aloysius Wisnubroto, Hyronimus Rhiti (2024). An Analysis of the Theory of Justice against the Standard of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt in the Judge's Decision in the Jessica Kumala Wongso Case. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 7(09), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-745121