An evaluation of sensitivity of provocative tests used in the carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosis depending on clinical severity of the syndrome

Journal Title: Rehabilitacja Medyczna - Year 2009, Vol 13, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: Using popular provocative tests to diagnose the carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) facilitates referring patients for specialist treatment and is indispensable to the performance of epidemiologic studies. Patients with severe carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) are frequently referred for surgery, whereas people with mild CTS are commonly referred for conservative therapy. Finding out which provocative tests are most effective in diagnosing mild cases can aid clinicians in making decisions about further treatment.Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of provocative tests used for diagnosis of CTS such as Phalen’s, Durkan’s and Tinel’s sign and to find out if the time of paresthesia occurrence during the tests depended on the severity of the syndrome assessed using Levine’s Questionnaire.Material and methods: The study involved 130 women and 33 men with carpal tunnel syndrome confirmed by ENG. 52 patients had bilateral symptoms so a total number of cases examined was 215. Subjects were tested using four CTS provocative tests in random order: Phalen’s, Durkan’s, Provocative and Tinel’s sign. The examiner waited 2 – 3 minutes between each provocative test to ensure that any nerve irritation caused by previous test had abated. Severity level of CTS was assessed using Levine’s Questionnaire .Results: Sensitivity values were: for Phalen’s Test – 85.6%, Durkan’s Test – 86.5%, Provocative Test 84.6%, and Tinel’s sign – 46%. Sensitivity values for Phalen’s, Durkan’s and Provocative tests are higher than 93,1% for moderate, severe and extreme CTS. There is a relationship between testing positive on CTS provocative tests and severity of clinical symptoms. As the severity of CTS increases, the average time of paresthesia occurrence in median nerve distribution decreases. Conclusions: (1) Tinel’s sign should not be recommended as a CTS diagnostic tool because of its low sensitivity. (2) If Levine’s Questionnaire reveals small progression of CTS the sensitivity of the tests is insufficient to confirm CTS. (3) In the case of patients with moderate, severe or extreme CTS according to Levine’s Questionnaire, the diagnosis can be confirmed using valid provocative tests such as Phalen’s, Durkan’s and Provocative.

Authors and Affiliations

Filip Georgiew, Ewa Otfinowska, Tomasz Adamczyk

Keywords

Related Articles

Reliability of the “Expanded Get-Up-and-Go-Test” (ETGUG) in assessing basic movement ability in patients qualified for surgery due to pulmonary cancer

Background: The Expanded Get-Up-and-Go-Test (ETGUG) allows for the measurement of the basic movement functions of daily life. This test has not been universally applied to date and no sufficient surveys as to its reliabi...

Postoperative exercise-based rehabilitation in lung cancer – aspects of kinesiotherapy

Combination of moderate to high-intensity aerobic training with submaximal progressive resistance training is reportedly associated with a measurable increase in VO2peak and 6MWT in patients operated on for lung cancer....

Assessment instruments and the ICF in rehabilitation and physiotherapy

This article describes the use of the ICF, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, in rehabilitation and physiotherapy and the way the ICF can help to select proper assessment instruments...

Comparative effects of burst mode alternating current and resisted exercise on physical function, pain intensity and quadriceps strength among patients with primary knee osteoarthritis

Background and objective: The benefi cial effect of Resisted Exercise (RE) in Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) rehabilitation is often hamstrung by the presence of other comorbidities affecting exercise implementation, hence the...

Wpływ relaksacji na natężenie bólu przewlekłego i poziom sprawności

Wstęp: Długotrwałe odczuwanie bólu oraz cierpienie nim wywołane powodują liczne zaburzenia fizyczne, psychiczne oraz społeczne, i może być czynnikiem ograniczającym sprawność funkcjonalną.Cel: Ocena wpływu relaksacji na...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP82038
  • DOI -
  • Views 42
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Filip Georgiew, Ewa Otfinowska, Tomasz Adamczyk (2009). An evaluation of sensitivity of provocative tests used in the carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosis depending on clinical severity of the syndrome. Rehabilitacja Medyczna, 13(2), 17-22. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-82038