ANALYSIS OF DECENTRALISATION PROJECTS IN THE CONTEXT OF RESOLVING THE CRISIS IN UKRAINE
Journal Title: The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies - Year 2015, Vol 0, Issue 1
Abstract
The article discusses three decentralisation designs considered by either of the parties to the conflict in the east of Ukraine as instrumental in resolving the crisis: the devolution of power to local territorial communities, territorial autonomy of Donbas, and the federalisation of the state. While each of the decentralisation projects bears risks for territorial integrity and long-term development given the current level of state capacity, only the devolution of power to local territorial communities, if properly implemented, will delegitimise claims of the rebel groups in the Donbas region, prevent any secession attempts in the future, and strengthen the state.
Authors and Affiliations
Olesia Kompaniiiets
ANNA PACZEŚNIAK, EUROPEIZACJA POLSKICH PARTII POLITYCZNYCH, PUBLISHED BY WYDAWNICTWO NAUKOWE SCHOLAR, WARSZAWA 2014, pp. 270. (REV.)
recenzja
SOCIAL AND POLITICAL INSTABILITY AND THE RELATIONSHIP TO EDUCATIONAL REFORM IN KURDISTAN
Formal education can be a mechanism for increasing social tolerance, political transparency and cultural integration; thus, a discussion of the relationship between political and social instability and resultant struggle...
The Struggle for Contemporary Turkey’s Future: Tension between AK Party and the Hizmet Movement
Without doubt, tension between Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) and the Hizmet Movement is of vital importance for both Turkey and international society. This conflict is also important for Turkey’s fu...
TURKEY’S NEW FOREIGN POLICY: THE QUEST FOR REGIONAL HEGEMONY IN THE MIDDLE EAST?
The last decades saw Turkey evolving from its Cold War era model of foreign relations, when it was the bastion of the West in the region, which involved alliance with the US and Israel. Following the doctrine of Ahmed Da...
(REV.): SEAN MCFATE, THE MODERN MERCENARY. PRIVATE ARMIES AND WHAT THEY MEAN FOR WORLD ORDER, OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, NEW YORK 2014, PP. 248.
recenzja