ANTI-KNOCKING CHARACTERISTICS OF MOTOR GASOLINE FUEL IN RECIPROCATING LYCOMING O-320 ENGINE IN COMPARISON TO AVIATION GASOLINE FUEL

Journal Title: Energy Reviews (ER) - Year 2018, Vol 2, Issue 2

Abstract

Aircraft engines worldwide rely on 100 low lead (100LL) aviation gasoline (AVGAS) for its safe operation. AVGAS basically contains high levels of tetraethyl lead (TEL) which boost its octane ring and assist in anti-knocking. Knock or detonation refers to the rapid explosion of the fuel instead of burning smoothly within the engine cylinders which can cause serious damage to the engine. The 100LL AVGAS is mainly utilized in aircraft engines in order to minimize the occurrence of this event. However, the leaded AVGAS is one of the major reasons for lead emission into the atmosphere. It contributes to serious health impacts among humans. The only solution for this problem is to make unleaded motor gasoline (MOGAS) as the substitute for leaded AVGAS for the use in reciprocating aviation engines as MOGAS is capable of giving a comparable performance to the AVGAS. However, the unleaded MOGAS has relatively lower octane rating compared to leaded AVGAS. This increases the tendency of the gasoline to ignite instantaneously during combustion stroke of the engine which increases the probability for the occurrence of engine detonation. Therefore, a research is carried out to study on the anti-knocking characteristics of these fuels. In this study, the full-scale engine detonation performance of the locally available unleaded MOGAS fuels are determined and compared to typical leaded AVGAS fuel. This is done by performing a full-scale Lycoming O-320-B2A reciprocating engine performance test to obtain comprehensive data on engine detonation. The fuels tested in this study are 100LL AVGAS, RON100 MOGAS, RON97 MOGAS and RON95 MOGAS. Each of these fuels is tested at a time in the Lycoming O-320-B2A engine and the knock data are recorded. From the experiment conducted, it can be concluded that the 100LL AVGAS has the best anti-knocking characteristics followed by RON100 MOGAS, RON97 MOGAS and lastly RON95 MOGAS.

Authors and Affiliations

Eshwar Kumar Munusamy, Rahmat Mohsin

Keywords

Related Articles

USE OF SOLAR ENERGY FOR BUILDING AIR CONDITIONING AND DOMESTIC HOT WATER PRODUCTION – CASE STUDY ELBREGA-LIBYA

The aim of this study is the evaluation of the economic and technical viability for the installation of a solar air conditioning system based on parabolic solar concentrators and adsorption technology, in an existent bui...

DIVISION OF TECTONIC BELT FROM DIFFERENT PERIODS IN RAOYANG SAG

Secondary tectonic belt is the focus of oil and gas exploration, because it controls the conditions of oil and gas traps directly. Raoyang sag experienced several tectonic movements, and there are great differences betwe...

RENEWABLE FOR POWER GENERATION : CLEAN ENERGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT

This study highlights the energy problem and the possible saving that can be achieved through the use of renewable energy technologies. Also, this study clarifies the background of the study, highlights the potential ene...

DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT IN EMULSION CONTAINING MONOETHANOLAMINE AND 2-AMINO-2-METHYL-1-PROPANOL.

In industry, the removal of carbon dioxide is very important because of the optimization of the capital and the operation cost of a process, to meet the specification of the gas and for environmental purpose. The absorpt...

EXPLORING MICROBIAL FUEL CELL-ASSISTED BIOREMEDIATION OF TEXTILE DYES: ENERGY CONVERSION

Prior studies indicated that –OH and/or –NH2 substituent containing auxochrome compounds (e.g., 2-aminophenol and 1-amino-2-naphthol) could act as electron shuttles (ESs) to stimulate wastewater decolorization and bioele...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP404427
  • DOI 10.26480/er.02.2018.01.07
  • Views 108
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Eshwar Kumar Munusamy, Rahmat Mohsin (2018). ANTI-KNOCKING CHARACTERISTICS OF MOTOR GASOLINE FUEL IN RECIPROCATING LYCOMING O-320 ENGINE IN COMPARISON TO AVIATION GASOLINE FUEL. Energy Reviews (ER), 2(2), 1-7. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-404427