Are Automated Blood Pressure Apparatus Reliable? Automated Versus Manual Measurement of Blood Pressure

Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - Year 2018, Vol 12, Issue 8

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: With hypertension becoming a global burden, it is necessary to validate the Blood Pressure (BP) recordings, used to screen and follow-up patients for hypertension. Since three different devices (mercury manometer, aneroid meter, and digital) are commonly used throughout the world, a study was proposed to compare the recordings of the three devices. Aim: To evaluate the validity of aneroid and digital BP monitors as compared to mercury manometer. Materials and Methods: BP was measured in 240 healthy subjects of both sex (Male=127, Female=113) using mercury manometer, aneroid and digital BP monitor from the same arm consecutively with five minutes interval between each recording. The data were analysed using SPSS 21, Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) readings of aneroid and digital monitors were compared with mercury manometer. British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol, Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) standards and Bland Altman scatter plots were used to validate the aneroid and digital BP monitors. Results: The difference in SBP measured using mercury manometer and aneroid meter was 0.675±7.12 mmHg and mercury manometer and digital monitor was 1.65±11.08 mmHg. The difference in DBP using mercury manometer and aneroid meter was 1.75±6.3 mmHg and mercury manometer and digital was 2.76±8.8 mmHg. While aneroid meter satisfied the AAMI criteria, digital monitor did not. The BHS grade for aneroid meter was C (poor) and digital D (very poor). According to Bland-Altman plot, the bias in SBP for aneroid was minimal with 0.675 (-13.28-14.63), for digital -1.41 (-21.66-18.84) and in DBP for aneroid was 1.75 (-10.6-14.1), for digital was the highest with 2.76 (-14.47-20.01). Conclusion: BP measured using aneroid and digital monitors varied significantly from the mercury manometer and showed higher levels of inaccuracy and hence should be used with caution in clinical setting.

Authors and Affiliations

K Madhan Srinivasan, K Senthil Kumar, I Saraswathi, A Lokeshwar Raaju, B Vishwanatha Rao

Keywords

Related Articles

Assessment of Primary Solid Renal Mass using Texture Analysis of CT Images of Kidney by Active Contour Method: A Novel Methody

Introduction: The overall incidence of the renal masses is on the rise. With better imaging modalities more of these masses are picked up earlier. Most of the times, the diagnosis is confirmed after radical nephrectomy....

Duplicated RCA with Anomalous Origin of Left Circumflex Artery: A Rare Case Report

ABSTRACT Coronary artery anomalies are found in around 1-2% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Uncovering of more coronary anomalies has increased with increase in awareness and easy availability of non invasiv...

Quantitative Analysis of Remineralization of Artificial Carious Lesions with Commercially Available Newer Remineralizing Agents Using SEM-EDX- In Vitro Study”

Introduction: The basic principle of remineralization is by advocating a biological or non-invasive approach rather than the surgical approach for early enamel lesions. There are relatively newer products available for r...

Serum Urokinase Plasminogen Activator as a Novel Biological Marker for COPD- A Review

ABSTRACT Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), a progressive disease of the airways is associated with chronic inflammation of respiratory passages that leads to irreversible lung dysfunction and distinct morphol...

Tiny Creature in Oral Cavity: A Case Report

Oral cavity is nidus of much pathology. Some may arise due to altered eating habits such as meat, uncooked food etc. The parasitic infections arising from ingesting uncooked pork (larva of pork tapeworm) called as cystic...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP523134
  • DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2018/34993.11868
  • Views 65
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

K Madhan Srinivasan, K Senthil Kumar, I Saraswathi, A Lokeshwar Raaju, B Vishwanatha Rao (2018). Are Automated Blood Pressure Apparatus Reliable? Automated Versus Manual Measurement of Blood Pressure. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 12(8), 9-12. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-523134