Are Retrospective Patient Chart Audits an Affordable and Reliable Answer to Healthcare Data Needs? Assessing the Ground Reality

Abstract

Medical records at various institutes and hospitals are unrecognized and not utilized to the fullest in spite of their relevance in identifying crucial information on patient and disease management. If this medical data is appropriately channelized by outcome driven analysis plans like retrospective chart audits, the results will certainly provide insights for many unanswered medical queries. Retrospective chart audits are the scientific and systematic review of existing medical records suited for the quality assessments of patients with lifestyle disorders (like Obesity, Diabetes, etc.), specifically in epidemiology research. They also assist researchers to understand the safety profile of certain classes of drugs (e.g. Psychiatry and CNS disorders). This article offers an overview on the applications and the business insights derived from retrospective chart audits whereby assessing the reality of implementing this methodology in terms of standard clinical research and regulatory requirements. Medical records or charts are valuable resources for essential clinical information. A retrospective chart review (RCR) or medical chart audit (MCA) is a well-established research design in which pre-recorded medical or clinical information in the form of charts are thoroughly reviewed to arrive at research and business insights [1]. Retrospective chart audits are neglected and largely undervalued compared to randomized clinical trials in spite of their capabilities to harness valuable insights from historical medical records [2]. They could potentially provide meaningful insights in relatively lesser time and on a limited budget [3]. Chart audits have several distinct advantages like the relatively inexpensive ability to explore rich readily accessible existing data-sets within less time, easier access to conditions with a long latency between exposure and disease, the ability to study rare occurrences, and most importantly, the generation of hypotheses that can be tested prospectively [2]. Though RCRs have many advantages, they also have some limitations, which restrict researchers from adopting them. However, the advancement of technology and the advent of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) have made life easier for researchers in overcoming these limitations effortlessly. Less than a decade ago, nine out of ten doctors in the US updated their patient files manually and retained them in colour coded files. A report says that at the end of 2017, approximately 90% physicians will use the EMR system [4]. This report itself outlines the future landscape of the data collection method. The EMR system was introduced some time back in some Nordic countries in Europe, and within very less time these countries have 100% penetration in terms of both primary and secondary data. The EMR adoption rate among various hospitals from 2012 to 2017 has increased significantly at the rate of 27% [5]. Considering that EMRs are better accepted and adopted by clinicians, they provide a promising option for tapping into hitherto unavailable data. Discussion Patient chart review studies were conventionally used to understand the burden of illness and patterns of care in hospitals or treatment institutes. However, this methodology is increasingly being adopted to cater to the data requirements associated with marketing authorization and risk management, which also includes the data on off-label medication use. Pharmaceutical companies are more enticed towards these types of studies considering the research benefits, since they help generate significant insights from hitherto under-utilized resources.

Authors and Affiliations

Uttam Barick, Anto Vijaykanth, Hitesh Bharucha, Arun Gowda, Anand Patil, Stefan Bosbach, Behsad Zomorodi

Keywords

Related Articles

Sentinel Ganglion

Sentinel lymph node technique is well known among physicians who treat breast cancer or melanoma but is roll in colorectal cancer is still under investigations. We made an analysis of this simple technique th...

Tumor Associated Macrophages (TAMs) In the World of Cancer

Cancer is a disease extremely difficult to defeat. Besides tumor cells, the microenvironment is influencing progress and metastasis. Recently, it has been discovered that macrophages may promote progress of the tumors. T...

Bichectomy: Achieving Aesthetic, Funcional and Psychological Results with A Simple Intraoral Surgical Procedure

Bichectomy, or Bichat fat pad removal, is a surgical procedure indicated when there is excess volume on the middle third of the face (bellow the cheekbones / zygoma) giving it a chubby or round look. The ideal candidates...

Multisession CyberKnife Radiosurgery for Symptomatic Abducens Nerve Palsy

Abducens nerve palsy causes diplopia which lowers patients’ quality of life. Nerve palsy due to tumor compression is treated by surgery, but Abducens nerve is difficult to access. Ten patients with benign and malignant t...

Restoring a Fractured Central Incisor: A Challenge to Overcome

Restoring a single central incisor should aim at preserving the affected tooth as well as re-establishing function and esthetic. This clinical report describes a patient with compromised smile due to the fracture of the...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP592745
  • DOI 10.26717/BJSTR.2018.07.001476
  • Views 159
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Uttam Barick, Anto Vijaykanth, Hitesh Bharucha, Arun Gowda, Anand Patil, Stefan Bosbach, Behsad Zomorodi (2018). Are Retrospective Patient Chart Audits an Affordable and Reliable Answer to Healthcare Data Needs? Assessing the Ground Reality. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research (BJSTR), 7(2), 5797-5800. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-592745