Arguments in Support and Against Euthanasia

Journal Title: Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research - Year 2015, Vol 9, Issue 7

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present and confront the arguments in support of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide, and the arguments against. The arguments for and against euthanasia are listed and discussed to literature cited. Euthanasia is an act of mercy, and, basically means to take a deliberate action with the express intention of ending a life to relieve intractable, persistent, unstoppable suffering. The phenomenon about both the morality and legality of euthanasia and physician assisted death have been a significant debates of the last decades of the twentieth century and they will remain further a source of controversies. This paper explores and analyze the arguments in support and against euthanasia and physician assisted suicide. For the purpose of this article has been viewed over the Internet and Google total of 247 journal articles, book chapters and websites, and, in writing of this article we used 74 references cited in the manuscript. The ‘end of life’ issue in relation to euthanasia and physician assisted suicide is a most widely discussed phenomenon not only in academic and official literature, but also in daily life. Euthanasia should be legally permissible if certain conditions are present: the patient is terminally ill, death is imminent, and, treatment was appropriate and well. If a patient autonomously chooses to end his life or have someone else assist him in doing so, then it is morally permissible. Patient must be fully informed of the diagnosis and prognosis of an incurable, fatal disease, and competent to make the decision. This article is a contribution to the debate on the important topic of euthanasia. We conclude that euthanasia should be used only in cases of last resort and not as an alternative to palliative care.

Authors and Affiliations

Visnja Strinic

Keywords

Related Articles

A Mini-Review of Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Its Role in Urological Treatment of Kidney Stones

Background: It is estimated that 1 in 11 people will experience symptoms for kidney stones within their lifetime, in which men are marginally affected more than women. As there are a range of treatment options available...

Dental Considerations of a 4-year-old Girl with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome. Case Report and Literature Review

We present the developmental, oral, clinical, radiographic findings and oral treatment of a 4-year-old girl presenting with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), which is a severe disabling childhood epilepsy disease that is tr...

Pattern of Pharmacotherapy of Patients Having Ischemic Heart Disease at a Specialized Hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh: A Survey Based Study on Patients Discharged from Hospital

Aims: Study on pharmacotherapeutic pattern on cardiovascular patients is rarely done. Patient’s demography, drug usage and its clinical outcome are the basis for the assessment of cardiac treatment. The aim of this study...

Comparison of Subciliary, Subtarsal and Transconjunctival Approaches for Management of Zygomaticoorbital Fractures

Aims: To compare access of the surgeon and bleeding during surgery, and ectropion and scar following the surgery in subciliary, subtarsal, and transconjunctival incisions for treatment of the zygomaticoorbital region. St...

Biologics and Biosimilars: Differences and Clinical Implications

Biologics or biopharmaceuticals are drugs derived from living organisms by recombinant technology. Biologics have made a significant contribution to the management of certain chronic diseases such as cancer, rheumatoid,...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP347946
  • DOI 10.9734/BJMMR/2015/19151
  • Views 52
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Visnja Strinic (2015). Arguments in Support and Against Euthanasia. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, 9(7), 1-12. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-347946