As to the question on civil judicial responsibility

Abstract

The article is dedicated to civil judicial responsibility and its establishment in the civil judicial legislation of Ukraine. The actuality of this range of problems is related to ever rising development of the non-mandatory and contentious grounds in the civil rule-making, envisaging a wide circle of judicial possibilities. The author marks insufficient development of the institute of civil judicial responsibility in the civilistic judicial science. A conclusion is made, that the civil rule-making lacks approvals for the nonperformance of social judicial duties. It is underlined in the research that the selection of civil judicial responsibility as an independent one is grounded on the presence of its specific qualities, among that there can be related as follows: actual and legal founding, subjects of responsibility and the form of its expression. The researcher proceeds from a conceptual position, that civil judicial responsibility finds the expression by means of the norms of civil judicial law as measures of defense and measures of responsibility. Thus, the use of the category “measure” as it applies to civil judicial responsibility is not optimal, as a measure is peculiar only to denotation of the scope of punishment. In the article a chapter of Civil-judicial code of Ukraine about the measures of judicial compulsion is analyzed. The author estimates taking of warning critically, moving away from the hall of the judicial meeting and drive of witness to the number of measures of civil judicial responsibility, supposing that these actions have administrative-legal nature. It is argued, that temporal withdrawal of written and material proofs that are obtained on demand by the court is not the measure of judicial compulsion. It is proved in the research that a new edition of a chapter of the Civil-judicial code of Ukraine about the measures of civil judicial responsibility must contain approvals for the nonperformance of some social judicial duties. In general such approval is a refuse in execution of a judicial action or impossibility to realize his/her right by a person participating in the case. The author analyses a theory and practice of civil rule-making in the USA and Great Britain in part of normative regulation of measures of judicial responsibility. Achievement of aims of judicial responsibility, namely: providing of effective justice and prevention of violations in the future – is a basis of modernization of home civil judicial legislation

Authors and Affiliations

Hennadii Tymchenko

Keywords

Related Articles

To the anniversary of the founder of the national school of legal political science I.O. Kresina

To the anniversary of the founder of the national school of legal political science I.O. Kresina

The results of scientific, scientific and organizational activities of the Koretsky Institute of State and Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in 2015

The results of scientific, scientific and organizational activities of the Koretsky Institute of State and Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in 2015

Principles on the Choice of law in international Commercial Contracts as a new way of unifcation in the feld of private international law

The Hague Conference on Private International Law, which, as an organization designed to unify the rules of private international law, for over a hundred years has been developing international treaties on various aspect...

Legal services: to determine the essence and content

In the article explored the essence of the «service» as a social category. Societal content «services» is defined by the fact that they are a form of social interaction and contribute to a relationship between the subjec...

Concept of law-enforcement activity

Over the past decades, Ukraine has won its independence and has established itself as an independent state in the world community. It makes sure steps towards updating all spheres of public life, its democratization, inv...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP432488
  • DOI -
  • Views 89
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Hennadii Tymchenko (2017). As to the question on civil judicial responsibility. Правова держава. Щорічник наукових праць (Pravova derzhava), 28(), 206-212. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-432488