Assessment of bone resorption differences in patients rehabilitated with screw retained prosthesis and telescopic crowns: A pilot study

Journal Title: Journal of Dental Specialities - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 1

Abstract

Introduction It is a well known fact that the life of patient after the removal or exfoliation of all teeth becomes miserable as patient usually has common complaints of inappropriate chewing function along with some pain with the conventional dentures The aim of this present study was to evaluate the difference in amount of bone resorption in the edentulous patients who were rehabilitated with telescopic implant denture versus those who were given screw retained prosthesis in the posterior areaMaterials and MethodThe present study comprised of a total of 20 male edentulous patients from the outpatient so as to place four implants in each arch with the use of cone beam computed tomography CBCT and surgical technique without raising the flap After the insertion of prosthesis panoramic radiograph was done immediately another after six months and one more after twelve months of using the prosthesisResultsThe results of this present study depicted that even if the bone loss in Group I was slightly higher than Group II but still the difference in the bone resorption in both the groups remained insignificant p value005DiscussionAs it is a well known fact that resorption of alveolar ridge occurs throughout life as it is a continuous process so there was expected reduction in the height of alveolar ridges in the two study groups The most probable reason for this reduction in bone height is that the transmitted forces to the alveolar bone exceed the normal level of bone toleranceConclusionThis study concludes that no single treatment option is better or worse than the other and both can be used to rehabilitate the edentulous patients based upon the factors of cost of treatment invasiveness and patient preferencesKeywordsTelescopic crowns Screw retained prosthesis Bone resorption

Authors and Affiliations

K. Sayed Akber Pasha, Sandeep Bhatia, Rajdeep Singh

Keywords

Related Articles

Conventional tooth supported overdenture with metal reinforced opposing complete denture: A case report

The overdenture is a removable prosthesis that is supported by both selectively retained teeth and the residual ridge or mucosa. It is a versatile and successful means of achieving long-term restoration of a partially ed...

Second premolar extraction improves the angulation of developing third molars better than first premolar extraction among subjects undergoing comprehensive orthodontic treatment

Objective: To test the null hypothesis that premolar extraction had no favorable effect on the angulation of developing third molar among subjects undergoing comprehensive orthodontic treatment. Materials and Methods: Pr...

Threat to implants: Peri- implantitis: A case report

The use of dental implants has revolutionized the treatment of partially and fully edentulous patients today. Implants have become a feasible treatment approach for managing a broad range of clinical dilemmas due to thei...

Veneers in esthetic zone – A case series

With the growth of cosmetic dental procedures the practise of dentistry has become increasingly centred on fulfilling patient desires Porcelain veneers are increasing in popularity among todays patients and dental practi...

Knowledge, attitude and practice of dental products by the out patients of dental college and hospital - questionnaire survey

Introduction: Awareness, attitude and pattern regarding oral health among general public has grown, but the practice of self-medication is posing a threat to life. Therefore the aim of the study was to evaluate self-medi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP512911
  • DOI 10.18231/2393-9834.2018.0011
  • Views 65
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

K. Sayed Akber Pasha, Sandeep Bhatia, Rajdeep Singh (2018). Assessment of bone resorption differences in patients rehabilitated with screw retained prosthesis and telescopic crowns: A pilot study. Journal of Dental Specialities, 6(1), 46-49. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-512911