Assessment of humoral immune response in vaccinated domestic dogs and cats intended for pet-travel from India by Rapid Florescent Focus Inhibition Test (RFFIT)

Journal Title: Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences - Year 2017, Vol 5, Issue 0

Abstract

The present study evaluates humoral response in vaccinated domestic dogs and cats intended for pet-travel from India by Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test (RFFIT). In present study, 184 serum samples from dogs (n=149) and cats (n=35), vaccinated within the period of one year against rabies were tested by RFFIT using PV-3462 strain of rabies virus and BHK 21 cells. Out of total studied 149 dogs samples (male-96, female-53), 122 showed titre =0.5 IU/ml and 27 below <0.5 IU/ml. Interestingly, all the 35 samples from cats showed titre =0.5 IU/ml. The protection observed in vaccinated dogs was 81.87 per cent and in vaccinated cats it was 100 per cent. The analysis showed serum sampling between 20-50 days will have higher percentage of vaccinates with neutralizing antibody titre > 0.5 IU / ml than those collected < 20 days and > 50 days. Association of the age factor of the vaccinated dogs and getting varied neutralizing antibody titre was evident. Whereas gender and breed based on size did not reveal any statistically significant effect on antibody titre. Furthermore, Out of eight vaccine brands, only one (V8) yielded 100 percent (9/9) protection, whereas the remaining seven resulted in 61.53 (8/13 in V1) to 90.90 (10/11 in V6) percent protection. The failure to protect 18.13 (27 / 149) per cent of dogs even after vaccination is alarming. The exact cause for failure to protect these vaccinated dogs is unknown; the possible reasons could be attributed to age, genetic profile, and brand of vaccine used and non-maintenance of cold chain of vaccine / sample of animal.

Authors and Affiliations

Santosh AK, Isloor S, Rathnamma D, Sharada R, Sunilkumar KM, Balamurugan V , Yathiraj S, Satyanarayana ML

Keywords

Related Articles

Response of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor M.) to Three Irrigation Systems under Treated Waste water and Fresh Water Irrigations system

The treated wastewater is highly used as an alternate source of water for growing crops like sorghum for forage/fodder to livestock in Arabian Peninsula water deficit countries including Oman. In present study, high fora...

Water quality in aquaculture and non-aquaculture sites in Taal lake, Batangas, Philippines

Aquaculture activities are often blamed for the degradation of water quality of aquatic ecosystem. Present study was conducted to determine the water quality of Taal Lake at two different study sites viz. one under inten...

SURFACE STERILIZATION PROTOCOL FOR Curcuma angustifolia ROXB. MICROPROPAGATION

For the micropropagation of Curcuma angustifolia usually rhizome buds are used as explants which are definitely associated with various types of soil-born microorganisms, therefore only one type of sterilant cannot be us...

Enzyme-Based Biodegradation of Hazardous Pollutants – An Overview

There has always been a paramount concern over the widespread occurrences of various pollutant types, around the globe. With ever increasing scientific knowledge, socio-economic awareness, human health problems and ecolo...

INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT LEVEL OF WATER AND FERTILIZER APPLICATION THROUGH DRIP SYSTEM ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF KINNOW MANDARIN (Citrus reticulata BLANCO)

A field experiment was conducted at fruit orchard, Department of Horticulture, CCS HAU, Hisar to standardize the optimum level of water and NPK fertilizers through drip system for the sustained production of Kinnow manda...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP428128
  • DOI 10.18006/2017.5(5).606.613
  • Views 29
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Santosh AK, Isloor S, Rathnamma D, Sharada R, Sunilkumar KM, Balamurugan V, Yathiraj S, Satyanarayana ML (2017). Assessment of humoral immune response in vaccinated domestic dogs and cats intended for pet-travel from India by Rapid Florescent Focus Inhibition Test (RFFIT). Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences, 5(0), 606-613. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-428128