Assessment of the Pre-operative Nutritional Status of Patients who were Scheduled for Elective Surgery and Determination of Nutritional Support Requirements

Journal Title: HASEKİ TIP BÜLTENİ - Year 2016, Vol 54, Issue 4

Abstract

Aim: We aimed to evaluate the nutritional status with clinical, antropometric and laboratory methods in patients who were scheduled for elective surgery. Methods: Retrospective evaluation of 90 patients in a period of 4 years was performed. Patients with tumors (group 1) were compared with controls (group 2) in regard to nutritional status. Student t-test, MannWhitney U test and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The mean age of patients in group 1 (3 males, 8 females) and group 2 (35 males, 44 females) was 62.8±11.0 and 47.7±16.2 years, respectively. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 30.1±6.6. Triceps thickness and circumference of the upper mid-arm were 2.2±0.8 and 28.6±4.2 cm, respectively. All patients had a Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) score A, but two patients were classified as having moderate nutritional risk according to Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) 2002. The mean length of hospital stay was 2.6±2.4 days. Complications were observed in four patients of group 2 and in two patients of group 1. Gender, SGA score, albumin, prealbumin, BMI, triceps thickness, circumference of the upper mid-arm and complication rates were statistically similar between the groups. There was a statistically significant difference in age, NRS 2002, gastrointestinal system findings, length of hospital stay, sedimentation and fasting blood glucose levels between the groups. Conclusion: Patients with nutritional risk can be detected using the NRS 2002. Nutritional support was necessary in 2% of all cases and in 18% of group 1 patients. However, advantages of antropometric measurements, biochemical tests, BMI and SGA could not be shown.

Authors and Affiliations

Bahri Özer, Ahmet Kocakuşak, Cihad Tatar, Adil Koyuncu, Suat Benek, Hüsnü Aydın, Gamze Çıtlak, Halit Özgül

Keywords

Related Articles

Postpartum Intrauterine Device Insertion: Is There Any Difference Between Vaginal and Cesarean Births?

Aim: To determine the difference between the postplacental insertion of intrauterine device (IUD) in women with vaginal and cesarean delivery. Methods: This study included 142 women who gave birth between 38 to 42 weeks...

Which Cytological Characteristics are More Valuable for Papillary Carcinoma in Thyroid Fine-needle Aspiration?

Aim:­Fine-needle aspiration plays a significant role in the evaluation of solitary thyroid nodules. Several cytological criteria are defined and these primarily aim to distinguish papillary carcinoma (PC), the most commo...

Distribution of the Rate of Morbidity and Mortality Developing After Surgical Treatment of Non-small Lung Cancer Surgery by Years

Aim: The most effective treatment for lung cancer is surgery. Morbidity rates remained almost constant over the years. However, morbidity rates have started to decline with better management of preoperative and postopera...

Evaluation of Optokinetic Nystagmus Asymmetry in Surgically Treated Infantile Esotropia Patients

Aim: To evaluate the relationship between binocularity and optokinetic nystagmus asymmetry (OKN) in patients with infantile esotropia. Methods: The study design was prospective and cross-sectional. Ten patients who under...

Congenital Chylothorax in a Newborn with Down Syndrome

In the neonatal period, the most common cause of pleural effusion is idiopathic congenital chylothorax. Congenital chylothorax is rarely associated with chromosomal abnormalities, such as Down, Turner and Noonan syndrome...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP227909
  • DOI 10.4274/haseki.3136
  • Views 115
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Bahri Özer, Ahmet Kocakuşak, Cihad Tatar, Adil Koyuncu, Suat Benek, Hüsnü Aydın, Gamze Çıtlak, Halit Özgül (2016). Assessment of the Pre-operative Nutritional Status of Patients who were Scheduled for Elective Surgery and Determination of Nutritional Support Requirements. HASEKİ TIP BÜLTENİ, 54(4), 232-236. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-227909