Assessment of various calculation methods for measurement of LDL-Cholesterol
Journal Title: International Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Research - Year 2016, Vol 3, Issue 4
Abstract
Background: Coronary Artery Disease is the leading cause of death worldwide and LDL has been recommended as the primary lipid subset for prediction of risk of CAD NCEP guidelines. Many assays have been developed for measurement of LDL levels and have shown reasonable accuracy as compared to reference method but still not cost effective and cannot be affordable by majority of laboratories. Laboratories use the cost effective Friedewald’s formula for calculating the LDL instead of direct assay which give near to accurate value but has its own limitations. In recent days many newer formulae have come up with lesser limitations and here an attempt is made to evaluate these formulae and to correlate with direct measurement of LDL. Methodology: It’s a cross sectional study. Sampling technique is Census method and involves sample size of 1020 cases. The entire lipid Parameters (LDL, HDL, TC, and TG) were estimated using Kits purchased by Roche /Cobas and then LDL also calculated using various formulae. Data was entered in Excel and analysed by Epi info software. Descriptive statistics like mean, standard deviation, standard error of mean were calculated. Student t test and Pearson’s correlation are used to find the correlation between measured LDL and calculated LDL at different intervals of TG, TC and HDL. Results: A total of 1020 samples were studied. The Cordova Formula correlated well in all the 1000 samples as a whole and in subjects with normal lipid profile and also at all lipid levels except for TG < 200mg/dl, TC < 100mg/dl. At TG < 200mg/dl Anandaraja’s formula shows better correlation and at TC < 100mg/dl none of the formulae performed well as all formulae negatively correlated with the direct measurement of LDL. Conclusion: Even though Cordova formula in our study has outperformed the other formulae, there are lots of factors which will affect the calculation. So it is highly recommended to switch to newer direct assays available in the market which are more precise, accurate, cost effective and also having low total allowable error < 12 and and a CV of <4%
Authors and Affiliations
Mahantesh Patil, Shubha Jayaram, Meera S
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP243013
- DOI -
- Views 75
- Downloads 0
Evaluation of serum uric acid in type two diabetic nephropathy patients
Introduction Diabetic nephropathy is one of the leading complications of longstanding diabetes mellitus With the background of inflammation there is need for laboratory tests for early diagnosis and prevention of diabeti...
Study of serum ferritin and HbA1c in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Introduction Diabetes is a metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycaemia which is associated with rise in the HbA1c Excess iron damages cells of pancreas due to oxidative stress which can contribute to pathogenesis...
Assessing the utility of serum Cholinesterase, Lactate dehydrogenase and Albumin/Globulin ratio in differentiating liver diseases
Introduction: Variety of liver diseases including alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is responsible for liver related morbidity and mortality in India. Distinguishing ALD from non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and viral he...
Usefulness of serum gamma glutamyl transferase in assessing severity of preeclampsia
Introduction: Pre-eclampsia is a multisystem disorder, unique to pregnant women after twenty weeks of gestation. In India the incidence of pre-eclampsia is reported to be 8-10% of the pregnancy. It contributes significan...
Vitamin D status and its association with diabetes mellitus in population of Udaipur
Studies have shown that Vitamin D is necessary for normal insulin secretion. Vitamin D reduces insulin resistance through regulation of the insulin receptor gene and its effects on calcium and phosphorus metabolism. Ther...