AT A CROSSROADS: THE CASE OF `PATHOLOGICAL ARBITRATION CLAUSES` WHICH DETERMINE A JURISDICTIONAL FIGHT

Abstract

The so-called ‘pathological arbitration clauses’ are ambiguously drafted arbitration agreements which disrupt the setting in motion of an arbitration proceeding. A particular situation is the case where parties refer both to the jurisdiction of the arbitration tribunals and to that of the domestic courts in their contracts, without giving further detail. Such agreements may be interpreted in different ways and they currently cause controversy among several theorists and practitioners. However, in recent years the arbitration tribunals strive to maintain the validity of the defective arbitration clauses by preferring an interpretation which gives effect to the clauses over one which does not. Our paper briefly examines this kind of defective arbitration clauses and the solutions provided by doctrinaires and courts. In the end, we assess the issue and attempt to establish the parties’ true intention in order ‘to remedy’ the pathology.

Authors and Affiliations

Paul COMȘA

Keywords

Related Articles

AT A CROSSROADS: THE CASE OF `PATHOLOGICAL ARBITRATION CLAUSES` WHICH DETERMINE A JURISDICTIONAL FIGHT

The so-called ‘pathological arbitration clauses’ are ambiguously drafted arbitration agreements which disrupt the setting in motion of an arbitration proceeding. A particular situation is the case where parties refer bot...

THE PROTECTION OF OLFACTORY CREATIONS

The olfactory works/creations, the perfumes that everyone likes are some of the oldest intellectual goods. Their creation involves science, imagination, talent. But in spite of the spectacular evolution of this category...

THE E-BIKE PATH: LEGAL APPROACH IN EUROPEAN UNION LAW

Are there simple thinks that anyone can do and that can change our world? Some says that using bikes in our cities will make us healthy, more focused and smart, happy, living in cleaner environment, having safer roads an...

WORLD MERCHANDISE TRADE

This article is mainly based on the most recent statistical data of the World Trade Organization and some aspects related to the evolution of world merchandise trade, in terms of volume and value, in 2015. The volume of...

DEFICIENCIES IN ENACTING ARTICLE 44 OF ROMANIAN LAW NO.111/1996 REGARDING THE SAFE DEPLOYMENT, REGULATION, AUTHORIZATION AND CONTROL OF NUCLEAR ACTIVITIES

In this paper, the author analyses the main practical issues that can be discussed when enacting the provisions of article 44 of Romanian Law no.111/1996 regarding the safe deployment regulation, authorization and contro...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP301900
  • DOI -
  • Views 267
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Paul COMȘA (2018). AT A CROSSROADS: THE CASE OF `PATHOLOGICAL ARBITRATION CLAUSES` WHICH DETERMINE A JURISDICTIONAL FIGHT. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 10(12), 217-222. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-301900