Author’s response
Journal Title: Roczniki Psychologiczne - Year 2013, Vol 16, Issue 4
Abstract
In the discussion on my article, a number of important issues have been raised. Despite the variety of opinions, the participants in the discussion were unanimous about the fact that although defining client welfare is essential for professional ethics, it is more important to build a sense of professional identity and to make efforts to obtain accurate knowledge of the nature of the client as a person. Implementing ethical standards into the relationships between psychologists, namely between researchers and practicing professionals, seems to be an extremely important issue. In my response I try to indicate the possible directions of further reflection in this area.
Authors and Affiliations
Katarzyna SIkora
On What Is Important When We Think of Psychology in Poland
The author takes up the problem of the condition of psychology as an academic discipline. He narrows down the scope of his reflections to answering four questions concerning the context of the country in which psychology...
Krytyczne myślenie przede wszystkim
Wagi nadawane emocjom pozytywnym o genezie automatycznej vs refleksyjnej a wskaźniki poziomu poczucia szczęścia
Wiele badań wskazuje na rolę pozytywnych emocji w wyznaczaniu ogólnego poczucia szczęścia. Prezentowane w artykule badanie dotyczy związku między relatywną wagą nadawaną różnego rodzaju emocjom pozytywnym a deklarowanym...
The Virtual Sphere of Contemporary Psychology
Professor Brzeziński's paper provokes two conclusions. The first one concerns the argumentation, which is matter-of-fact, competent, and therefore difficult to argue with. The second conclusion concerns the question of w...
Adjective markers of Polish indigenous lexical personality factors: A peer-rating study
Studies of other people's personality trait perception have been of marginal significance in the psychology of personality. Such studies usually use tools developed specifically for self-rating research. Similar studies...