Barriers to Using Balance and Gait Assessment Tools by Physical Therapists in Patients with Neurological Impairments: A Systematic Review

Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Research & Bioethics - Year 2017, Vol 8, Issue 4

Abstract

Introduction: The balance disability and pathological gait caused by neurological impairments deter activities of everyday living and social participation, deteriorate the quality of life, and increase the risk of falling. Physical therapeutic intervention plays a critical role in improving the balance disability and pathological gait. For effective physical therapy, accurate assessment of a patient is a priority. Objective: This study aimed to identify the barriers regarding the use of the balance and gait assessment tests in patients with neurological impairments. Method: Two reviewers used Electronic databases (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PEDro and RISS) to assess the titles and abstracts from the literature published until Dec. 2016 with the use of keywords, including "balance or posture or postural control or postural stability", "gait or walking or locomotion or ambulation", "test or assessment or measurement or outcome measure or assessment tool or measurement tool", "barriers", and "facilitators", read the full texts of identified articles, selected the publications related to the purpose of our study, and then analyzed materials from the literature. Result: Independent reviewers and one analyst selected six materials from the literature relevant to the purpose of our study, and identified several barriers to using the balance and gait assessment tools by physical therapists, including therapists and patients’ individual factors (lack of knowledge, low priority, and patients’ functional ability), environmental factors (time, cost, space, and low organizational support), and measure-specific factors of the assessment tools (reliability, validity, and assessment tools appropriate for population). Conclusion: Our study revealed the barriers to the use of the balance and gait assessment tool. Overcoming the barriers is essential to make it possible for physical therapists to efficiently use the tool for balance and gait assessment.

Authors and Affiliations

Ho Young Jang, You Lim Kim, Jung Lim Oh, Suk Min Lee

Keywords

Related Articles

The Horns of Dilemma: Life or Sovereignty?

Death and dying are the bitter truth that is faced by every person inevitably. Paying respect to the decision of a patient in a hospital setting is always a challenging task. In eastern countries, family plays an importa...

A Role of ICH- GCP in Clinical Trial Conduct

The Good Clinical Practice Guideline of the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH-GCP) is an international ethical, scientific and quality standard to harmonize technical procedures and standards, improve qualit...

Measuring Workload of Clinical Trials: Transcultural Adaptation and Validation to Portuguese Language of Ontario Protocol Assessment Level (OPAL)

Introduction: The increase number of clinical protocols with different requirements and specificities, the demand for the quality of the data according to the good clinical practices evidence the need of an instrument ca...

Why Tuberculosis Has Not Been Eradicated? Need for Vision and Bold Innovative Research

Tuberculosis has not been eradicated despite advancements in science. Main reason is that research and its utilization have gone into a deep rut because of lack of vision and innovation. Knowledge about epidemiology of t...

Palliative Care: An Alien Concept in Pakistan

Every living being has to die. Respecting a dying individual’s personal values and preferences is a challenge. We live in a culture where family decisions are given priority over individual’s wish. To address this challe...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP358800
  • DOI 10.4172/2155-9627.1000309
  • Views 38
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ho Young Jang, You Lim Kim, Jung Lim Oh, Suk Min Lee (2017). Barriers to Using Balance and Gait Assessment Tools by Physical Therapists in Patients with Neurological Impairments: A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Research & Bioethics, 8(4), 1-6. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-358800