BENEFITS VERSUS RISKS OF PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS: ARE WE OPENING THE CAN OF WORMS

Abstract

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most commonly used drugs worldwide They are indicated for treatment of Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), acid peptic disorders, stress ulcers and prophylaxis of NSAID induced ulcers.[1] PPIs are more efficacious than other drugs like histamine -2 receptor blockers for the treatment of these disorders.[1] Though PPIs are highly potent and effective acid suppressors they are often misused and prescribed irrationally. The incidence of irrational use of PPIs varies from 40-70 % in different studies. [2] In one of our previous studies 58 % of PPIs prescriptions were irrational. [2] These findings become much more significant in the light of recent findings which suggest correlation of long term use of PPIs to myocardial infarction and kidney injury. [3,4] The PPIs may be deemed safe for short term use but chronic use carries risk of hip fractures, infection with clostridium difficle, community acquired pneumonia.[2] PPIs exposure in elderly population was also found to be associated with hyperparathyroidism in one recently conducted study.[5] The ongoing long term studies for assessing the safety and association of PPIs with various serious outcomes may open up a new can of worms. Keeping in mind the benefits as well as risks of proton pump inhibitors, clinicians should judiciously use these drugs in practice. The patients should also be educated regarding the adverse outcomes of PPIs on long term therapy as these drugs are easily available without prescription.

Authors and Affiliations

Naser Ashraf Tadvi| Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Email id: nasertadvi@yahoo.co.uk, Sajid Hussain| Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Majmaah University, Usama Bin Ghaffar| Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Majmaah University

Keywords

Related Articles

Relationships Between Service Personal Values, Service Value, Satisfaction, and Loyalty: A Study Regarding Services of Private and State Hospitals in Turkey

Service and value are the two inseparable concepts in experiential service environment. Service personal value is a concept that is subjectively assessed from a consumer perspective, and is associated with service value...

Histopathological approach for diagnosis of intravascular leiomyosarcoma of the femoral vein

Malignant tumors arising from venous walls in the lower extremities are uncommon and intravascular leiomyosarcoma represents only a small proportion and rare of soft tissue leiomyosarcoma. All publications in the liter...

Comparing the complications of purse-string and simple ligation of appendix stump in appendectomy: A randomized clinical trial

Appendectomy is one of the most prevalent emergency surgeries in the world. In the present research, the consequences of closing off stump appendicitis via simple ligation versus purse-string were compared and contrast...

Quantitative comparison between amount of 25-Hydroxy vitamin D in Serum of 20-35 years old population of in Iran; In Winter and In Summer

Vitamin D deficiency is very frequently observed among young women. Vitamin D deficiency is high in winter because of reduced exposure to sunlight. The main objective of this study was to Assessment 25-hydroxyvitamin D...

EFFECTS OF PRANAYAMA ON GALVANIC SKIN RESISTANCE (GSR), PULSE, BLOOD PRESSURE IN PREHYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS (JNC 7) WHO ARE NOT ON TREATMENT

Background: Psychological stress, in this era of urbanization, has become a part and parcel of our lives and has lead to serious problem affecting different life situation and carries a wide range of health related diso...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP11571
  • DOI 10.5958/2319-5886.2016.00018.7
  • Views 257
  • Downloads 10

How To Cite

Naser Ashraf Tadvi, Sajid Hussain, Usama Bin Ghaffar (2015). BENEFITS VERSUS RISKS OF PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS: ARE WE OPENING THE CAN OF WORMS. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences (IJMRHS), 5(1), 91-91. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-11571