Biochemical Complexity. Emergence or Design?

Journal Title: Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy - Year 2006, Vol 3, Issue 0

Abstract

It is the criticism of Michael Behe’s concept of irreducible complexity. Author believes that Behe presents a false dichotomy of possible explanations of the origin of biochemical complexity: Darwinism-intelligent design. According to the author, biochemical complexity may be also an outcome of self-organization. He presents arguments that it is indeed the case.

Authors and Affiliations

Bruce Weber

Keywords

Related Articles

Defining Undesign in a Designed Universe

The argument from design, recast today in the Intelligent Design movement, relies critically on the contrast of designed things with undesigned things. This poses a problem for Christians, however, because they affirm th...

NOMA as the Cure for Conflict Between Science and Religion: Reply to Ludwik Kowalski’s Commentary on the NOMA Principle

In my response to Kowalski’s commentary I indicate that: 1) there is an imprecision in Kowalski’s presentation of the NOMA principle; 2) the NOMA principle is not a valid way of presenting theistic religions; 3) the argu...

Ponownie darwinizm kontra inteligentny projekt

Jest to recenzja książki Michaela J. Behe’ego Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution (The Free Press, New York 1996), zawierającej krytykę ewolucjonizmu. Orr uważa, co prawda, że jest to w ostatnich l...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP146028
  • DOI -
  • Views 112
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Bruce Weber (2006). Biochemical Complexity. Emergence or Design?. Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy, 3(0), 121-130. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-146028