Blasting Quarry Operations: Land Use Compatibility Issues and Potential Property Value Impacts

Journal Title: Journal of Environmental Law & Policy - Year 2022, Vol 2, Issue 03

Abstract

Aggregate resources are essential for road and building construction. In 2019, the US domestic production reached 1.53 billion tons of crushed stone valued at $18.7 billion produced by an estimated 1,430 companies operating 3,440 quarries, according to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Mineral Commodity Summaries. But, it is also recognized that a quarry blasting below the water table is one of the most noxious, toxic and destructive uses of land, with no reasonable prospect of post-extraction-rehabilitation. If permitted and established in the wrong geographic location, a blasting quarry operation can result in significant deleterious impacts on the environment and local inhabitants and can disrupt short and long-term land use planning objectives. Because a quarry can remain operational for 100+ years, impacting five or more generations; quarries have the potential to cause permanent environmental degradation, destabilize communities, damage, sterilize or diminish the use and enjoyment of residential and non-residential properties, and reduce property values. Blasting is the preferred method of extracting rock in a quarry operation, the consequences of which can lead to environmental and property damage, and to injury or death of human and non-human life. In North America, licensing and operational oversight of a pit or quarry are primarily controlled by the individual states, territories and provinces, and address matters of compliance, while issues related to land use planning and zoning are entirely within the jurisdiction of the local municipalities, counties or regions. Accordingly, this research paper seeks to inform land use planners of the importance of protecting the environment and its inhabitants from the adverse effects, including the diminution in property values, associated with aggregate extraction operations generally and blasting quarries specifically, through the use of permanent onsite setbacks and offsite separation distances to avoid land use incompatibility and sensitive land uses.

Authors and Affiliations

Tony Sevelka

Keywords

Related Articles

Biodiversity and Conservation: Cross-Border Legal and Regulatory Perspectives

This article provides an overview of the legal and policy frameworks for the protection of threatened and vulnerable wildlife on private lands in Canada and the United States, the approaches adopted in different jurisdic...

Conceptual Challenges to the Recognition and Enforcement of the Right to Clean, Safe and Healthy Environment

The right to clean or healthy environment, or what may be called environmental right, is one of the most controversial emerging rights since the agitation for the recognition of the link between human rights and the envi...

Ending Gas Flaring in the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry: The Need for Strict Regulatory Enforcement

Environmental pollution arising from gas flaring constitutes a major concern among the international community, particularly as a result of the negative impact it brings to society, environment, and economy. In the last...

Using Clean Energy for Sustainable Development in Vietnam: Facts and Solutions

Using clean energy is a recent trend around the world. It is a good way to protect the environment and implement the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations. Following that trend, in recent years, the Vietnam...

Environmental Protection and Public Participation in the USSR during the Latter 20th Century

This article considers the evolution of public participation in environmental protection and the “green movement” in the USSR and subsequent legal developments in the later part of 20th century. The article deals with le...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP716505
  • DOI 10.33002/jelp02.03.01
  • Views 33
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Tony Sevelka (2022). Blasting Quarry Operations: Land Use Compatibility Issues and Potential Property Value Impacts. Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, 2(03), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-716505