Bohai/Parhae Identity and the Coherence of Dan gur under the Kitan/Liao Empire
Journal Title: International Journal of Korean History - Year 2016, Vol 21, Issue 1
Abstract
The Liao shi [Liaoshi] (遼史) suggests that in 926 the Liao empire destroyed the state of Bohai, and afterward forced the Bohai people into servitude and resettlement across the empire. Modern archaeology together with epigraphical sources in the Kitan language confirm some of this narrative, but suggest a far more complicated story. Researches by scholars such as Aisingioro Ulhicun, Yoshimoto Michimasa, Im Sangsŏn, Sawamoto Mitsuhiro and Wang Shanjun have shed new light on the political circumstances of the Liao invasion of Bohai in 926 and the subsequent status of its inhabitants. A majority of the Bohai population remained in their traditional territories, where Bohai aristocrats, soldiers and high-ranking officials retained distinct roles in local administration. This essay looks at Bohai influence upon Liao administrative practices, the status of Bohai aristocrats of the Da lineage and elites such as Gao Mohan, and the probable outlines of Bohai demography to suggest that the Bohai role in transmission of Northeastern political traditions, in particular, may have been much more important than would be suggested on the basis of standard literary resources. Instead of being a doomed people whose identities and social structures evaporated after Liao resettlement policies stranded them in remote and inhospitable surroundings, the Bohai story may actually be one of political continuity and a seminal influence upon their successors, the Jurchens and ultimately the Manchus.
Authors and Affiliations
Pamela Kyle Crossley
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP26426
- DOI https://doi.org/10.22372/ijkh.2016.21.1.11
- Views 305
- Downloads 11
BREUKER, Remco E. Establishing a Pluralist Society in Medieval Korea, 918–1170: History, Ideology and Identity in the Koryŏ Dynasty. Leiden, Netherland: Brill, 2010, xvi+484 pp.
The issue of pluralism in society is a complicated subject, requiring an even more cautious approach if the society in question is from the premodern period. Although the issue of “diversity” has been raised and discuss...
Recent Research Trends on Jurchen-Manchu Studies in Korea
Koreans originated from Manchuria and had established a number of states there in ancient times. Manchuria was also the main route connecting Korean and Han Chinese states in the premodern period. People in the Korean...
Main Points of Contention in Terms of the Studies on Tan'gun and Kojosŏn
Kojosŏn(古朝鮮) is widely understood to be the first political body in the history of Korea. Within the paradigm of Korean history, Kojosŏn is perceived as having been composed of three political bodies with different...
The Limits of Decolonization: American Occupiers and the “Korean Problem” in Japan, 1945-1948
Korean and Japanese officials have never engaged in direct negotiations to reach a postcolonial settlement, unlike what followed the breakup of many European colonies. Instead, the problem of how to dissolve Japanese col...
Global History and East Asia : A Late Chosŏn Perspective
Some Asia historians have recently argued for a new understanding of global history by reexamining how the European countries took the lead in making modern civilization and capitalism, specifically concentrating on hist...