Bosna i Hercegovina u aktuelnim srpskim i hrvatskim političkim koncepcijama // Bosnia and Herzegovina in current Serbian and Croatian political conceptions
Journal Title: Historijski pogledi/Historical views - Year 2021, Vol 4, Issue 6
Abstract
In this article, with some methodological dilemmas, an attempt is made to speak more clearly from a certain historical perspective about the current Serbian and Croatian political conceptions towards Bosnia and Herzegovina, which „produce“ an almost permanent political crisis in this area - from Dayton to today. The continuity and current effects of these policies, which have their roots in some dark historical depths and myths, never changing their essence and their goals, were pointed out. In the current Serbian and Croatian political conceptions, Bosnia and Herzegovina is treated as a „sphere of interest“, which should be mastered as much as possible in peace, if it did not succeed in the war. Serbia and Croatia, in the historical sense, since they have existed as political entities, have been opposed to each other in almost everything. The only thing on which there was a high degree of agreement was the question of the division of Bosnia and Herzegovina, again depending on historical circumstances and other circumstances. (to mention only Tudjman and Milosevic). In the last few years, intensive cooperation and a high degree of „agreement“ between Serbian and Croatian politics have been noticed, again „regarding“ Bosnia and Herzegovina, its status and the definitive post-Dayton division. In this sense, it is not difficult to recognize several common characteristics of both policies. In this article, the author focuses on the following: the first is a declarative and formal public declaration of both to respect the integrity and sovereignty of Bosnia and Herzegovina, while in practical politics this sovereignty is continuously violated and „trampled“, acting as its „rulers“. . Another common feature is the belittling and labeling of all pro-Bosnian political forces, reducing them to „political Sarajevo“ in the pejorative sense of the word, with multiple offensive and deeper meanings, which, in addition to Milorad Dodik (to make the absurd even greater, as president or member of the Presidency of BiH) from the Serbian one, Zoran Milanović, the current president of Croatia, until yesterday a declared friend of Bosnia and the pro-Bosnian SDP, is increasingly expressing himself in his own way. Obstruction of the process of reforms and rapprochement of Bosnia and Herzegovina with the European Union and NATO membership is the third session of the characteristics of Serbian and Croatian politics (albeit in different versions), while the fourth, denial of decisions and verdicts of the Hague Tribunal for crimes and atrocities is dominant over Bosniaks (again in a different version): Serbs deny genocide verdicts, and Croats deny convictions for the Joint Criminal Enterprise. In addition to common characteristics, this paper highlights some special features of the current Serbian and Croatian policy towards Bosnia and Herzegovina, which, again, boils down to one goal: to strengthen (make independent) the Republika Srpska and cantons with a Croat majority, as well as the position of Croats in Federation with the aim of forming a third entity and at the same time weaken the state of Bosnia and Herzegovina until the question of the meaning of its existence is raised. The state's inability to organize the procurement of coronavirus vaccines is just one of the latest proofs that these destructive political forces have succeeded to a great extent. This article points out the consequences of such a policy and emphasizes the need to stop further degradation and collapse of Bosnia and Herzegovina as a state. Such forces exist, they just have to be activated.
Authors and Affiliations
Omer Hamzić
Review: Sead Selimović, Za jedinstvo domovine i slavu dinastije. Školstvo u Bosni i Hercegovini za vrijeme Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca, Centar za istraživanje moderne i savremene historije Tuzla, Tuzla 2021, 442 str.
Review: Sead Selimović, Za jedinstvo domovine i slavu dinastije. Školstvo u Bosni i Hercegovini za vrijeme Kraljevine Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca, Centar za istraživanje moderne i savremene historije Tuzla, Tuzla 2021, 442...
Dejtonske kontroverze – Javno odlučivanje između parlamentarne demokratije i partitokratije // The Dayton controversies – public decision-making between parliamentary democracy and partitocracy
In Bosnia and Herzegovina, the pluralization of society and the state began during 1990. This is the time when political parties are formed and the first multi-party parliamentary elections are held. Due to the strong in...
OD UČITELJSKE ŠKOLE DO FILOZOFSKOG FAKULTETA U TUZLI: PRILOG PROUČAVANJU TRANSFORMACIJE VISOKOŠKOLSKOG OBRAZOVANJA // FROM THE TEACHER'S SCHOOL TO THE FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY IN TUZLA: CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY ON THE TRANSFORMATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION
The paper presents the history of higher education transformation in the region of northeastern Bosnia until the founding of the Faculty of Philosophy, nowadays modernly organized higher education institutions, whose roo...
PRIKAZ/REVIEW Damir Bošnjaković, TOJŠIĆI OD SREDNJEG VIJEKA DO 1958. GODINE, Knjiga Prva, Arhiv Tuzlanskog kantona, Centar za istraživanje moderne i savremene historije Tuzla, JU Bosanski kulturni centar „Alija Izetbegović“ Kalesija, Tuzla 2018, 189 str.
PRIKAZ/REVIEW Damir Bošnjaković, TOJŠIĆI OD SREDNJEG VIJEKA DO 1958. GODINE, Knjiga Prva, Arhiv Tuzlanskog kantona, Centar za istraživanje moderne i savremene historije Tuzla, JU Bosanski kulturni centar „Alija Izetbegov...
Albanci u Jugoslaviji od kraja 60-ih do početka 80-ih XX stoljeća // The Albanians in Yugoslavia from the late 1960s to the early 1980s
The paper focuses on the events after the Brioni plenum of the Central Committee of the LCY in 1966. The turning point for the development of the national relationships in the Yugoslav federation became namely the Brioni...