BRIEF CONSIDERATIONS ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ROMANIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, THE STRASBOURG COURT AND THE LUXEMBOURG COURT

Abstract

In 2018, our country celebrates the 11 years that have passed since Romania's accession to the European Union, this year also being a preparatory year for the Romanian presidency of the Council of the European Union. Throughout its history, Romania has undergone profound transformations, one of which being the emergence of a new constitutional order after the Revolution of 1989, represented by the 1991 Constitution, revised in 2003, which established the principles of functioning of the state governed by the rule of law, as well as its operating mechanisms. The constitutional review was assigned to the Constitutional Court, as the guarantor of the Constitution's supremacy and the sole authority of constitutional jurisdiction. The jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court has been steadily evolving, but it is indissolubly linked to that of the Strasbourg Court and that of the Luxembourg Court. The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, on the one hand, and the Treaties establishing the European Union, as well as the European law, as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union, are the benchmark elements of the constitutional review. In this context, it seems relevant to analyse the relationship between the Constitutional Court of Romania, the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, from a theoretical perspective, but especially from a jurisprudential perspective.

Authors and Affiliations

Cristina TITIRIŞCĂ

Keywords

Related Articles

NATIONAL SECURITY AS A LEGAL CATEGORY

This article describes such notions as “security”, “national security”, types of national security, recent changes in the National security of Bulgаrian doctrine. According to the author trust and partnership relations b...

CHALLENGES OF INTERPRETING THE NOTION OF SOFTWARE COPYRIGHTS IN THE CURRENT ECONOMIC AND SOCIO-POLITICAL CONTEXT

Every country has it’ s own interpretation and enforcement of copyrights. The challenge is in case of a conflict of interpretations to create a common structure accepted by all parties as a base of mutual understanding a...

THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION’S INTERPRETATION OF REGULATION (EU) NO 650/2012

According to the European legislator, European citizens should be able to organise their succession in advance, especially in the context of a succession having cross-border implications. To this end the European Parliam...

CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE LEGAL REGIME OF JOINT – STOCK COMPANIES SET UP BY PUBLIC SUBSCRIPTION

Capital companies (joint stock companies and partnerships limited by shares) may be set up under the Law no. 31/1990 (on companies) by instantaneous subscription or by public subscription. The companies set up by public...

VARIOUS HISTORICAL CONNOTATIONS OF THE CONCEPT OF SOVEREIGNTY

Sovereignty as a feature of state power, shall be expressed in terms of organizing and exercising, determining and resolving internal and external problems, freely and according to its will, without any interference, res...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP305513
  • DOI -
  • Views 97
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Cristina TITIRIŞCĂ (2018). BRIEF CONSIDERATIONS ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ROMANIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, THE STRASBOURG COURT AND THE LUXEMBOURG COURT. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 10(12), 700-704. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-305513