British-Polish Protocol in light of the Court of Justice of the European Union jurisprudence (N.S. v Secretary of State, Bonda, Fransson)

Journal Title: Studia Iuridica - Year 2016, Vol 68, Issue

Abstract

The Protocol No. 30 on the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to Poland and to the United Kingdom, so called “British-Polish Protocol”, annexed in 2007 to the Treaties by means of the Lisbon Treaty, led to many interpretational disputes about its legal status and consequences for application of the Charter in Poland and United Kingdom. However, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), continuing the protection of human and fundamental rights contained in the Charter, dispels some doubts concerning the Protocol significance through its case law. Judgment of the CJEU of December 21, 2011 in joined cases N.S. (C-411/10) v Secretary of State for the Home Department et M. E. and Others (C-493/10) v Refugee Applications Commissioner and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, as well as Advocate General’s Verica Trstenjak opinion delivered on September 22, 2011, confirms the normative content of art. 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, so that the applicability of the Charter in the United Kingdom or in Poland is unchallengeable. Significance of the Advocate General’s Juliane Kokott’s opinion, delivered on December 15, 2011, in case General Prosecutor v Łukasz Marcin Bonda (C-489/10) should not go unnoticed. It states that Protocol No. 30 cannot be seen as an opt-out clause, but shall be regarded as having only clarifying character and as construction guidelines. Broad scope interpretation of the Charter was what CJEU called in the case Åklagaren v Hans Åkerberg Fransson (C-617/10). It allowed to develop common standards for the interpretation and application of European Union fundamental rights.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Olga Kazalska

Keywords

Related Articles

Public Administration Reform in Ukraine in the Face of European Integration

The purpose of this study is to present selected aspects of complex issues of transformations in the public administration system of Ukraine, and changes of administrative law in the context of the European integration p...

Libertariańska krytyka locke’owskiego proviso

John Locke’s theory of property is one of the most influential. It has had (at least an indirect) impact on many political and legal doctrines: from liberalism and libertarianism to communitarianism and socialism. So-cal...

Foreign Terrorist Fighters from the Perspective of Polish and European Criminal Law

Foreign terrorist fighters represent one of the powerful threats to the security of states and humanity in the 21st century. Besides participating in the actions of the Islamic State, they also pose a significant danger...

Aktualne problemy postępowania pojednawczego

The text refers to the evolution and problems with interpretation of provisions of conciliatory court proceeding in Polish law. Conciliatory court proceeding is regulated by articles 184–186 KPC (The Civil Proceedings Co...

Konkurencyjność jako determinanta prawna europejskiej polityki rolnej

The article presents basic rules regarding to the evolution of legal mechanisms affecting the competitiveness of agriculture in Europe. Market mechanisms such as agricultural intervention, private storage subsidies or em...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP188479
  • DOI -
  • Views 130
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Olga Kazalska (2016). British-Polish Protocol in light of the Court of Justice of the European Union jurisprudence (N.S. v Secretary of State, Bonda, Fransson). Studia Iuridica, 68(), 125-140. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-188479