British-Polish Protocol in light of the Court of Justice of the European Union jurisprudence (N.S. v Secretary of State, Bonda, Fransson)

Journal Title: Studia Iuridica - Year 2016, Vol 68, Issue

Abstract

The Protocol No. 30 on the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to Poland and to the United Kingdom, so called “British-Polish Protocol”, annexed in 2007 to the Treaties by means of the Lisbon Treaty, led to many interpretational disputes about its legal status and consequences for application of the Charter in Poland and United Kingdom. However, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), continuing the protection of human and fundamental rights contained in the Charter, dispels some doubts concerning the Protocol significance through its case law. Judgment of the CJEU of December 21, 2011 in joined cases N.S. (C-411/10) v Secretary of State for the Home Department et M. E. and Others (C-493/10) v Refugee Applications Commissioner and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, as well as Advocate General’s Verica Trstenjak opinion delivered on September 22, 2011, confirms the normative content of art. 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, so that the applicability of the Charter in the United Kingdom or in Poland is unchallengeable. Significance of the Advocate General’s Juliane Kokott’s opinion, delivered on December 15, 2011, in case General Prosecutor v Łukasz Marcin Bonda (C-489/10) should not go unnoticed. It states that Protocol No. 30 cannot be seen as an opt-out clause, but shall be regarded as having only clarifying character and as construction guidelines. Broad scope interpretation of the Charter was what CJEU called in the case Åklagaren v Hans Åkerberg Fransson (C-617/10). It allowed to develop common standards for the interpretation and application of European Union fundamental rights.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Olga Kazalska

Keywords

Related Articles

Spółdzielcze własnościowe prawo do lokalu a prawo odrębnej własności lokalu. Przeszłość, teraźniejszość oraz perspektywa na kolejne 100 lat

The article is a review of housing cooperative law in the last 100 years. The aim is to approximate one of the limited real rights contained in article 244 of the Civil Code, a cooperative ownership right to a flat. Indi...

On the Use of Comparative Law by Judges in Private and Commercial Law Cases

Autor w artykule analizuje zagadnienie problemu wykorzystywania prawa porównawczego przez sędziów orzekających w sprawach cywilnych i handlowych. Założeniem wyjściowym dla analizy jest fakt, że odwołania do prawa obcego...

Ostatnie zmiany legislacyjne opłat adiacenckich

All urbanization processes causing the increase of real estate value bring benefits to their owners. This benefit provides to setting an adjacent fee. It is a quasi-tax for the benefit and reimbursement of expenditures b...

Świadczenie niegodziwe – trudne dziedzictwo rzymskiej inspiracji

Incorporating the rules inspired by the Roman condictio ob turpem causam into modern regulations of unjustified enrichment provokes criticism. Such regulations are diversified into several models but mostly invoke contro...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP188479
  • DOI -
  • Views 96
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Olga Kazalska (2016). British-Polish Protocol in light of the Court of Justice of the European Union jurisprudence (N.S. v Secretary of State, Bonda, Fransson). Studia Iuridica, 68(), 125-140. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-188479