BURDEN OF PROOF: PROCEDURAL UNDERSTANDING OF STANDARD OF PROOF

Journal Title: Administratīvā un kriminālā justīcija - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 80

Abstract

Topicality of a subject-matter “Burden of proof: Procedural understanding of standard of proof” is based on ambiguous understanding of the standard of proof in legal practice, that is, of the moment when a fact is considered to be proven or unproven. Goal of an article is to research legal regulation of burden of proof in civil procedure, administrative 51ADMINISTRATĪVĀ UN KRIMINĀLĀ JUSTĪCIJA 2017 3 (80) procedure, administrative offence procedure and criminal procedure law and to determine standard of proof within each of these procedures. Burden of proof, or duty to prove claimed fact, is an essential element of any evidentiary proceedings. Determination of standard of proof is ambiguously understood issue in legal theory and especially in legal practice. Ambiguous understanding of standard of proof in legal practice may cause determination of unproven facts as proven or vice versa, or even lead to finding innocent persons as guilty. Authors, by researching burden of proof in mentioned proceedings, provides an explanation on legal aspects of its standards.

Authors and Affiliations

Tatjana Jurkeviča, Kaspars Šmits

Keywords

Related Articles

DEVELOPMENT OF UNIFIED PROCEDURES FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS IN ORDER TO PREVENT MONEY LAUNDERING AND TERRORISM FINANCING

The relevance of the topic is confirmed by the changes taking place in the financial monitoring system: the expansion of the financial monitoring range of procedures complication´s supervisory bodies aimed at countering...

THE PUNITIVE DISTINCTION ON GROUNDS OF SEX IN THE PENAL CODE OF SPAIN AND THE ORGANIC LAW 1/2004 OF 28 DECEMBER ON INTEGRAL PROTECTION MEASURES AGAINST GENDER VIOLENCE

The aim of this article is to examine the punitive differences after come into force of the law 1/2004 of 28 of december, (LVG) because this law protect only women and not men, studying the differences in the law enforce...

20TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE FOUNDING OF JOURNAL ADMINISTRATIVE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE

In dem Artikel "Der Zeitschrift ist 20" setzt der Autor ein Ziel, die Publikationen zu verallgemeinern und die Übereinstimmung des Inhaltes der Zeitschrift mit den vom Gründer (Polizeiakademie Lettlands) und den Herausge...

STRATEGICALLY ESSENTIAL ENERGY SUPPLY OBJECTS IMPORTANCE IN THE CRIMINAL LAW

The aim of this article is to examine strategic importance of energy supply system in the context of criminal law by performing analysis of the provisions and penalties described in the Criminal Law. Currently, Criminal...

DETECTIVE ACTIVITIES AND SOME PROBLEMS IN SEARCHING OF MISSING PERSONS

The phenomenon of missing persons is one of the threats to the public perception of security, in whose preventing significant role belongs to police, detective companies and other non-governmental organizations involved...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP660185
  • DOI 10.17770/acj.v3i80.2788
  • Views 158
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Tatjana Jurkeviča, Kaspars Šmits (2017). BURDEN OF PROOF: PROCEDURAL UNDERSTANDING OF STANDARD OF PROOF. Administratīvā un kriminālā justīcija, 3(80), 44-51. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-660185