Carltona Doctrine in Administrative Law

Abstract

In the Administrative Law of England the Carltona Doctrine is basically concerned with the principle governing the relationship between a Minister and his Civil Servant, and the legal validity of the action taken by a Civil Servant without having previous authorisation to do so. The said doctrine was evolved by the Court in the famous case of Carltona v. Commissioner of Works1. In this case the situation was such that there was no general delegation of power and no specific authorisation in favour of the Secretary to sign a land acquisition order on behalf of the Minister. Therefore, the aggrieved person contended that the acquisition order signed by the civil servant was invalid. But the Court clinging to the conventional principle of Ministerial Responsibility held that the Secretary being in the position of an Alter Ego of the Minister could sign the Acquisition Order and that the Minister had the task of managing the affairs of the Department since he was the person responsible to Parliament. The Carltona doctrine was evolved in the context of a land acquisition matter, but subsequently in various other cases the question raised was whether the same principle could be applied to the other situations. In this article, an analysis is given first of the system of Responsibility and Accountability of the Ministers and Civil Servants as it had originated in the system of administrative Law. Then taking note of the gap in the state of law and the new situations the writer asserts that the deficiency in law called for a new principle to fill the gap is highlighted. It was in this background that the doctrine of Carltona emerged in the jurisprudence of English Administrative Law. An analysis is given of the elements of the Doctrine of Carltona. And proceeding further the writer has explored the cases to which the Carltona Doctrine could be applied and the cases to which the doctrine could not be applied.

Authors and Affiliations

Arbab Mohammed Abdul Rub

Keywords

Related Articles

Assessment of the Role of Egypt’s 2015 Parliament in Promoting Democracy and Good Governance

Democracy and good governance are no longer a luxury; however, they are essential for sustainable development. Parliaments are the imperative foundations of democracy and good governance. Authorities and functions of par...

The US Democracy Promotion in the Middle East, A Materialistic Approach: Actions versus Rhetoric

According to the democratic peace proposition, democratic states should promote democracy in non-democratic states not only as a value but also as a genuine interest. During the last two decades, the G. W. Bush and Obama...

EXAMINING THE EFFECTS OF POLITICAL INFLUENCES ON THE PROCUREMENT FUNCTIONS OF DISTRICT ASSEMBLIES IN GHANA

Procurement functions in most District, Municipal and Metropolitan Assemblies in Ghana are the preserve of the political appointees who head these institutions and often see purchases as a way of giving jobs to political...

PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF CORRUPTION IN SIERRA LEONE

There is no society in the world where corruption has not reared its ugly head. In Sierra Leone, there have been series of military coups and even a ten year civil war and corruption was cited as a reason for these occur...

THE LEGAL FRAMEWORKS THAT GOVERN ELECTRONIC ARBITRATION PROCESSES AND ITS ROLE IN RESOLVING INTERNATIONAL TRADING CONTRACTS DISPUTES

The electronic contract is governed by the general rules and provisions that are governed by the general theory of the contract. It is agreed between the parties to the contract, but it is characterized as a telecommutin...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP252401
  • DOI -
  • Views 138
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Arbab Mohammed Abdul Rub (2017). Carltona Doctrine in Administrative Law. International Journal of Political Science, Law and International Relations (IJPSLIR), 7(6), 1-8. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-252401