Cauchy, infinitesimals and ghosts of departed quantifiers
Journal Title: Математичні Студії - Year 2017, Vol 47, Issue 2
Abstract
rocedures relying on infinitesimals in Leibniz, Euler and Cauchy have been interpreted in both a Weierstrassian and Robinson’s frameworks. The latter provides closer proxies for the procedures of the classical masters. Thus, Leibniz’s distinction between assignable and inassignable numbers finds a proxy in the distinction between standard and nonstandard numbers in Robinson’s framework, while Leibniz’s law of homogeneity with the implied notion of equality up to negligible terms finds a mathematical formalisation in terms of standard part. It is hard to provide parallel formalisations in a Weierstrassian framework but scholars since Ishiguro have engaged in a quest for ghosts of departed quantifiers to provide a Weierstrassian account for Leibniz’s infinitesimals. Euler similarly had notions of equality up to negligible terms, of which he distinguished two types: geometric and arithmetic. Euler routinely used product decompositions into a specific infinite number of factors, and used the binomial formula with an infinite exponent. Such procedures have immediate hyperfinite analogues in Robinson’s framework, while in a Weierstrassian framework they can only be reinterpreted by means of paraphrases departing significantly from Euler’s own presentation. Cauchy gives lucid definitions of continuity in terms of infinitesimals that find ready formalisations in Robinson’s framework but scholars working in a Weierstrassian framework bend over backwards either to claim that Cauchy was vague or to engage in a quest for ghosts of departed quantifiers in his work. Cauchy’s procedures in the context of his 1853 sum theorem (for series of continuous functions) are more readily understood from the viewpoint of Robinson’s framework, where one can exploit tools such as the pointwise definition of the concept of uniform convergence. As case studies, we analyze the approaches of Craig Fraser and Jesper LЁutzen to Cauchy’s contributions to infinitesimal analysis, as well as Fraser’s approach toward Leibniz’s theoretical strategy in dealing with infinitesimals. The insights by philosophers Ian Hacking and others into the important roles of contextuality and contingency tend to undermine Fraser’s interpretive framework.
Authors and Affiliations
J. Bair, P. Blaszczyk, R. Ely, V. Henry, K. U. Katz, M. G. Katz, Taras Kudryk, S. S. Kutateladze, T. McGaffey, D. M. Schaps, D. Sherry
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP310088
- DOI 10.15330/ms.47.2.115-144
- Views 62
- Downloads 0
On the transcendental meromorphic solutions of a certain class of differential equations
In this paper we consider the differential equation F(k)−a2=eγ{α(F−a1)+β}, where ai(z),α(z)(≢0,∞), β(z)(≢∞), i=1,2 are small functions of F, γ is an entire function and k∈N. Let f be a transcendental meromorphic functi...
On uniqueness of entropy solutions for nonlinear elliptic degenerate anisotropic equations
In the present paper we deal with the Dirichlet problem for a class of degenerate anisotropic elliptic second-order equations with L1-right-hand sides in a bounded domain of Rn (n⩾2). This class is described by the prese...
Periodic words connected with the Tribonacci-Lucas numbers
We introduce periodic words that are connected with the Tribonacci-Lucas numbers and investigate their properties.
Klein vs Mehrtens: restoring the reputation of a great modern
Historian Herbert Mehrtens sought to portray the history of turn-of-the-century mathematics as a struggle of modern vs countermodern, led respectively by David Hilbert and Felix Klein. Some of Mehrtens' conclusions have...
Problem of determining of minor coefficient and right-hand side function in semilinear ultraparabolic equation
The problem of determining of the right-hand side function and the time depended minor coefficient in semilinear ultraparabolic equation from the initial, boundary and overdetermination conditions, is considered in this...