Cauchy, infinitesimals and ghosts of departed quantifiers
Journal Title: Математичні Студії - Year 2017, Vol 47, Issue 2
Abstract
rocedures relying on infinitesimals in Leibniz, Euler and Cauchy have been interpreted in both a Weierstrassian and Robinson’s frameworks. The latter provides closer proxies for the procedures of the classical masters. Thus, Leibniz’s distinction between assignable and inassignable numbers finds a proxy in the distinction between standard and nonstandard numbers in Robinson’s framework, while Leibniz’s law of homogeneity with the implied notion of equality up to negligible terms finds a mathematical formalisation in terms of standard part. It is hard to provide parallel formalisations in a Weierstrassian framework but scholars since Ishiguro have engaged in a quest for ghosts of departed quantifiers to provide a Weierstrassian account for Leibniz’s infinitesimals. Euler similarly had notions of equality up to negligible terms, of which he distinguished two types: geometric and arithmetic. Euler routinely used product decompositions into a specific infinite number of factors, and used the binomial formula with an infinite exponent. Such procedures have immediate hyperfinite analogues in Robinson’s framework, while in a Weierstrassian framework they can only be reinterpreted by means of paraphrases departing significantly from Euler’s own presentation. Cauchy gives lucid definitions of continuity in terms of infinitesimals that find ready formalisations in Robinson’s framework but scholars working in a Weierstrassian framework bend over backwards either to claim that Cauchy was vague or to engage in a quest for ghosts of departed quantifiers in his work. Cauchy’s procedures in the context of his 1853 sum theorem (for series of continuous functions) are more readily understood from the viewpoint of Robinson’s framework, where one can exploit tools such as the pointwise definition of the concept of uniform convergence. As case studies, we analyze the approaches of Craig Fraser and Jesper LЁutzen to Cauchy’s contributions to infinitesimal analysis, as well as Fraser’s approach toward Leibniz’s theoretical strategy in dealing with infinitesimals. The insights by philosophers Ian Hacking and others into the important roles of contextuality and contingency tend to undermine Fraser’s interpretive framework.
Authors and Affiliations
J. Bair, P. Blaszczyk, R. Ely, V. Henry, K. U. Katz, M. G. Katz, Taras Kudryk, S. S. Kutateladze, T. McGaffey, D. M. Schaps, D. Sherry
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP310088
- DOI 10.15330/ms.47.2.115-144
- Views 65
- Downloads 0
Pfluger-type theorem for functions of refined regular growth
Without a priori assumptions on zero distribution we prove that if an entire function f of noninteger order ρ has an asymptotic of the form log|f(reiθ)|=rρhf(θ)+O(rρδ(r)), E∌reiθ→∞, where h is the indicator of f, δ is a...
On generalized preopen sets
Firstly in this paper, we find some conditions under which μ-preopen sets of a GTS or μ-space X may be equivalent to μ-open in X. Finally, we obtain some characterizations of generalized paracompactness of a GTS or μ-spa...
Hilbert transform on W1σ
We obtain a boundedness criterion for the Hilbert transform on the Paley-Wiener space in the terms of decomposition. Since we have a simple method of evaluation of the Hilbert transform.
On applications of the Levi method in the theory of parabolic equations
A short review of papers where a fundamental solution was constructed by the Levi’s parametrix method is done. Some details of applications of this method for parabolic equations and systems of parabolic equations, in pa...
The Pfeiffer-Lax-Sato type vector field equations and the related integrable versal deformations
We study versal deformatiions of the Pfeiffer-Lax-Sato type vector field equations, related with a centrally extended metrized Lie algebra as the direct sum of vector fields and differential forms on torus.