Changing modes of global economic governance: from neo-liberalism to neomedievalism

Abstract

The system of global economic governance, as well as the global economy itself, is in the state of unceasing change. The concept of the architecture of the global economy, which is always identified with the existence of quasi-hierarchical structures of subordination of global economic potentials, shows its failure in modern conditions. It is shown that the modes of global economic governance have evolved substantially since the postwar period, which is equally true for all its spheres (trade, finance, migration, etc.). The analysis of the dynamics of changes in the regimes of global economic governance and the characteristics of the system allowed to draw several conclusions. During crises, institutions or leading states play a bigger role because of the need to achieve faster consensus, the availability of resources to solve problems, and better institutionalization. It is proved that the periods of change in the modes of global economic governance are shrinking in line with the reduction of the periods of global economy development. There is a transition from simple multilateralism on the background of neo-liberalism to hybrid forms attributed to the neo-medievalism. The results of the study show that the cyclicality in the replacement of the leading actor of global economic governance takes the next form: governments, integration regional unions, non-governmental organizations (producers) (intergovernmental organizations, international value networks, mega-regional agreements, respectively), which allows predicting changes in the modes of global economic governance. It is proposed that at the present stage it is worth considering separately the modes of global economic governance in its various spheres due to the lack of unified methods and mechanisms for solving global economic problems. One can observe a shift towards hybrid forms of governance based on negotiations, consensus, etc in all the spheres of global economic governance. The corresponding research can be supplemented by the analysis of cyclical patterns of global economic governance.

Authors and Affiliations

A. V. Kobylianska

Keywords

Related Articles

Formation of directions of harmonization of interests of the basic subjects of insurance

The article is devoted to the research of the theoretical bases of formation of insurance interest as a necessary prerequisite for the implementation of insurance. Based on the assessment of different views on the nature...

Structuring factoring business: accounting aspects

The article theoretically substantiates the fact that factoring belongs to the main operational activity of a factoring company, and this allowed structuring the factoring business by types of activity. The lack of a uni...

Development of scientific research on problems of accounting consequences of warfare defense and building of public territories

The research analyzes the dissertation researches concerning the direction of the organization development and the methods of accounting the consequences of military actions and the occupation of state territories. The i...

Аnalysis of competitiveness of agricultural enterprises: main problems and prospects

The article deals with the essence and specifics of the competitiveness of agricultural enterprises. The authors examine the current state of agriculture and its role in the economy of Ukraine. The authors determine the...

Redistributive financial resources in the system of social insurance of Ukraine

The research analyzes the scale of redistributive processes in the system of financial resources of the state social insurance in Ukraine. Established, the share of financial resources of state social insurance to GDP ha...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP551535
  • DOI -
  • Views 103
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

A. V. Kobylianska (2019). Changing modes of global economic governance: from neo-liberalism to neomedievalism. Вісник Житомирського державного технологічного університету. Серія: економіка, управління та адміністрування, 87(1), 162-168. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-551535