Changing modes of global economic governance: from neo-liberalism to neomedievalism

Abstract

The system of global economic governance, as well as the global economy itself, is in the state of unceasing change. The concept of the architecture of the global economy, which is always identified with the existence of quasi-hierarchical structures of subordination of global economic potentials, shows its failure in modern conditions. It is shown that the modes of global economic governance have evolved substantially since the postwar period, which is equally true for all its spheres (trade, finance, migration, etc.). The analysis of the dynamics of changes in the regimes of global economic governance and the characteristics of the system allowed to draw several conclusions. During crises, institutions or leading states play a bigger role because of the need to achieve faster consensus, the availability of resources to solve problems, and better institutionalization. It is proved that the periods of change in the modes of global economic governance are shrinking in line with the reduction of the periods of global economy development. There is a transition from simple multilateralism on the background of neo-liberalism to hybrid forms attributed to the neo-medievalism. The results of the study show that the cyclicality in the replacement of the leading actor of global economic governance takes the next form: governments, integration regional unions, non-governmental organizations (producers) (intergovernmental organizations, international value networks, mega-regional agreements, respectively), which allows predicting changes in the modes of global economic governance. It is proposed that at the present stage it is worth considering separately the modes of global economic governance in its various spheres due to the lack of unified methods and mechanisms for solving global economic problems. One can observe a shift towards hybrid forms of governance based on negotiations, consensus, etc in all the spheres of global economic governance. The corresponding research can be supplemented by the analysis of cyclical patterns of global economic governance.

Authors and Affiliations

A. V. Kobylianska

Keywords

Related Articles

Psychosemantic image of a worker as the factor of enterprise’s labor force formation

The presented paper depicts the conducted empirical study of the image of a successful laborer in the perception of student youth. The sample of participants was formed with the students of two Zhytomyr universities (Zhy...

Investment risks in the economic system of enterprise

The purpose of this paper is to conduct the comprehensive analysis of the impact of investment risks on the business entities and the search for effective mechanisms to overcome them or minimize. Any entity that runs bus...

The primary organization of accounting in budgetary institutions of Ukraine: development of the work plan accounts

The questions of primary accounting of economic activity of budgetary institutions in the modernization budget accounting subsystem. With the object of study chosen mechanism for building and operating its own chart of a...

Еnterprise’s corporate management improvement on the base of corporate culture development

The author reveals extremely important role of corporate culture and uniqueness of the corporate culture system. It is established that the corporate management is characterized above all, by the economic activity and co...

Forecasting of enterprise’s financial indicators as the basis for financial stability formation

The issue of company’s financial sustainability ensuring in modern business conditions is very important for enterprises of any size. This article is dedicated to the research of forecasting tools and their role for the...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP551535
  • DOI -
  • Views 110
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

A. V. Kobylianska (2019). Changing modes of global economic governance: from neo-liberalism to neomedievalism. Вісник Житомирського державного технологічного університету. Серія: економіка, управління та адміністрування, 87(1), 162-168. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-551535