Clinical Study Correlating Early Results Of Knee Range Of Motion In Posterior Cruciate Retaining And Stabilizing Total Knee Arthroplasty In A Tertiary Care Hospital

Abstract

Introduction: Total knee arthroplasty is a commonly performed surgery, most common indication being knee pain associated with functional limitations in activities of daily living. Near normal biomechanics duplication is essential to achieve desired results in total knee arthroplasty. This study is done to know the functional knee range of motion in patients undergoing cruciate retaining and stabilizing total knee arthroplasty. Methodology: This is a retrospective study of 52 patients with 58 knees from a prospectively maintained database. All patients with osteoarthritis treated with Total Knee Arthroplasty during the time period from February 2010 to January 2015 were selected for study. The study was conducted at the Department of Orthopaedics,SDM Medical College Dharwad. Once patients were identified all medical records and radiographs pertaining to them were reviewed and data collected. Results: In our study, we had 52 patients out of which 31 were females and 21 were males among which 6 females and 1 male underwent bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Mean age in our study group is 59.55 years. Comparative knee range of movement in cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty was 98.33 with significant pain, which increased to 101.67 degrees of painless movement post operatively. In cruciate substituting it was 94.21 with pain which increased to 98.39degrees of painless movement post operatively. Conclusion: Total knee arthroplasty has evolved to be a good solution for the patient with pain and deformity, hampering his/her activities of daily living. In our study, average flexion in cruciate retaining and in cruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty was comparable. There is no appreciable change in functional outcome in terms of pain relief, deformity correction, and probably longevity between the two groups.Long term studies may be necessary for a comprehensive conclusion

Authors and Affiliations

srinath K M, Ravi m Daddimani, Vishwanath K Patil

Keywords

Related Articles

ACL Reconstruction With Patellar Tendon And Hamstring Grafts – Which Is A Better Choice??

Background and Objectives: Young patients with ACL tear are prone for subsequent injury to menisci and cartilage eventually triggering a process of rapid degeneration. These people do well with early ACL reconstruction....

Surgical Reconstruction Of Non Union Patella And Neglected Patellar Tendon Rupture With Semitendinosus Graft – A Prospective Study

Background: Non-union of patella and neglected patellar tendon rupture cause significant disability due to disruption in extensor mechanism of knee. Reconstruction attempted months or years later is prone to unsatisfac...

Management of diaphyseal fracture of femur with antegrade and retrograde nailing (comparative study)

Diaphyseal femoral fractures are commonly encountered in routineorthopaedicsemergency.They occur commonly due to high velocity trauma and therefore are mostly associated with injuries such as head injury,chest injury as...

Braided, double stranded ss wire tension band wiring for patella fractures

Purpose of study Various surgical methods of treatment have been described in literature for displaced patella fracture. Though open reduction and tension band wiring is most commonly performed other fixation methods pr...

Ilizarov Treatment Of Complex Non-Union Tibia

Background: Non-union tibia is more common compared to other long bone non-unions. Irrespective of the cause, complicated non-unions are difficult clinical condition to patient as well as to treating surgeon. Resistant n...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP393862
  • DOI -
  • Views 121
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

srinath K M, Ravi m Daddimani, Vishwanath K Patil (2016). Clinical Study Correlating Early Results Of Knee Range Of Motion In Posterior Cruciate Retaining And Stabilizing Total Knee Arthroplasty In A Tertiary Care Hospital. International Journal of Orthopaedics Traumatology & Surgical Sciences, 2(0), 211-216. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-393862