COLLECTIVE REDRESS AND ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION – REMEDIES IN THE „CONSUMER TOOLKIT”

Abstract

Collective redress for compensation, also known as a group action or a class action, reunites consumers who have suffered the same or very similar loss or harm caused by the same trader. They come in court as a group and seek redress, in one legal claim. Alternative dispute resolution it’s a collective term for the ways that parties can settle a dispute by means of extra-judicial mechanisms with (or without) the help of a third party. Even if these two notions of „collective redress” and „ADR”, at first sight, apparently have little in common, these two topics have become closely related in disputes regarding consumers who have had their rights violated by traders. Even if judicial collective redress procedures cannot be replaced by Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) or amicable settlements, we must put aside the assumption that the courts offer the only technique that can deliver redress or that is not possible an amicable settlement procedure for mass claims. Parties in dispute should remain free to recourse to alternative means of dispute resolution before or in parallel to the formal introduction of the judicial claim, taking into account all available options. This study examines the different mechanisms available to consumers to resolve disputes, from private complaints handling to ADR and class actions. This paper aims to analyses the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches to dispute resolution and redress mechanisms, the limits of the out of court settlements and the current situation in the EU Member States, and the cross-border cases and solutions. It also approaches the enhance and the interconnection of the existing national ADR systems in creation of a powerful unified pan-EU mechanism, provided by Directive 2013/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the council on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes.

Authors and Affiliations

Monica CALU

Keywords

Related Articles

THE RESALE RIGHT

The article analyses one of the most important rights of the authors of original works of art namely: the resale right. It will be analyzed the subject matter of the resale right, the works of art to which the resale rig...

THE ACCOUNTING INFORMATIONAL SYSTEM, ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE STATE TREASURY, AN ESSENTIAL ELEMENT IN SUBSTANTIATING DECISIONS

The exercise of the management functions and relationships at the level of the organizations is achieved through the leadership system (or management). The management system of the group represents the assembly of elemen...

THE ECJ CASE-LAW ON THE ANNULMENT ACTION: GROUNDS, EFFECTS AND ILLEGALITY PLEA

For practitioners in the field, but also for academicians it is equally important to know that there exists, under certain circumstances, the possibility of bringing an action for annulment, having as object the legally...

THE ROLE OF SOVEREIGN DEBTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ACTUAL MACROECONOMIC ENVIROMMENT

Globally, the volume of public debt, most of which is sovereign debt, has increased significantly and although the macroeconomic development of most states has made good progress since the consequences of the global fina...

SCHOLASTIC LEGAL ENTITIES

The purpose of this paper is to bring into light a newly appeared type of legal person unknown until now, or at least until the Education Law in 2011. Since nothing concrete has been made to implement this new type of le...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP301885
  • DOI -
  • Views 128
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Monica CALU (2018). COLLECTIVE REDRESS AND ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION – REMEDIES IN THE „CONSUMER TOOLKIT”. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 10(12), 202-208. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-301885