Comparative analysis of 0.4% vs 0.5% ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution in post operative small incision cataract surgery patients

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 3

Abstract

Purpose: The study was to compare the effectiveness and patient tolerability of two strengths of ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution i.e. 0.4% vs 0.5% in post-operative small incision cataract surgery patients. The study was conducted in Sri Guru Ram Dass institute of medical Sciences and research Amritsar. Materials and Method: This is a randomized single blind investigator masked study. Total fifty patients (25 in each group) screened for cataract surgery were enrolled. The patients were randomized and either of study medication was used. Study medications were ketorolac 0.4% and ketorolac 0.5% eye drops. One drop of each drug was instilled in operative patient in each group thrice day. Thereafter, Slit-lamp examination was done for aqueous cell and flare. Intraocular pressure was checked. The patients were evaluated for subjective tolerance postoperatively at days 1, 3, 5 7, 15and 30. The results were compared between the groups, also with baseline. Results: Only difference between two strength ketorolac is less stinging, discomfort and better ocular tolerability of ketorolac 0.4%. The patient operative outcome is same in the both strength. Ketorolac 0.4% has proven to better tolerated on the visual analogue scale. Ocular comfort was also much better. Although this difference is not statistically significant. In other parameters, difference were not observed between the two groups for best-corrected visual acuity, IOP& slit-lamp assessment of cells and flare measured. Conclusions: 0.4% ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution is equally effective as 0.5% ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution in reducing post cataract inflammation. But Patients with 0.4% ketorolac reported less discomfort.

Authors and Affiliations

Manmohan Bhanot, Preet Sood

Keywords

Related Articles

C-Rhexis” the surgical grail in intumescent mature cataract

Background: Capsulorhexis in intumescent mature cataract has high chance of peripheral extension. This paper aims at describing a modified “C- rhexis technique”, with the unique mechanism of “simultaneously acting unidir...

Determination of the proportion of refractive errors in patients with primary complaint of headache and the significance of refractive error correction in symptoms relief

Introduction Headache attributed to refractive errors HARE is a common condition caused by myopia hypermetropia and astigmatisms Headache is not necessarily experienced by all individuals with REs HARE is mainly caused b...

Comparative study of use of pharmacological agents vs mechanical stretching techniques in management of small pupil in manual small incision cataract surgery

Purpose: Manual SICS requires a well-dilated pupil for nuclear management. Cataract with small pupil causes problems during nuclear management and Capsolorrhexis. In this study we share our own experience of using pharma...

Study of rise of IOP and visual acuity after ND YAG laser capsulotomy in patients with posterior capsular opacification

Aims: To assess the 1. rise of IOP without use of pre procedure and post procedure anti glaucoma medication 2. and to note the improvement in visual acuity. 3. to...

A study to evaluate safety and efficacy of corneal collagen cross-linking with riboflavin in keratoconus patients

Introduction Keratoconus is a disorder of progressive corneal steepening resulting in cone shaped protrusion of cornea corneal thinning myopia and astigmatismObjectives To assess the efficacy and safety of corneal collag...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP299761
  • DOI 10.18231/2395-1451.2017.0066
  • Views 90
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Manmohan Bhanot, Preet Sood (2017). Comparative analysis of 0.4% vs 0.5% ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution in post operative small incision cataract surgery patients. Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 3(3), 267-269. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-299761