Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Open Appendectomy and Laparoscopic Appendectomy

Journal Title: International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

Introduction: Open appendectomy (OA) is standardized among surgeons and, OA is typically completed using a small right lower quadrant incision and postoperative recovery is usually uneventful. It is the second most common general surgical procedure performed in India and the most common intra-abdominal surgical emergency, with a lifetime risk of 6%. Study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Material and methods: The present study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery of our medical college. For the study, we retrospectively viewed the medical records of patients aged 60 years or more with acute appendicitis who underwent Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and were compared to patients who underwent open appendectomy (OA). A total of 70 patients (35 each for LA and OA) were selected. The analysis of preoperative, intra-operative, and postoperative parameters was done and was compared. Results: A total of 70 patients were included in the study. Out of 70 patients, 35 patients underwent Laparoscopic appendectomy and 35 underwent open appendectomy. The Male/Female ratio in LA and OA group was 19/16 and 21/14 respectively. The mean age of patients in LA group was 63.1+3.2 years and in OA group was 66.2+3.1. The mean body weight of LA and OA group was 60.2+5.2 Kg and 61.9+3.1 kg respectively. The mean operative time period for LA was 101.8 minutes and for OA was 129.8 minutes. Blood loss more than 500 mL was seen in 5 patient for LA and 8 patients for OA. The nasogastric tube was employed in 6 patients in LA and 9 patients in OA. The mean postoperative stay after completion of procedure was 5.9 days for LA and 8.78 for OA. Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy is safer procedure in comparison to open appendectomy. The postoperative stay at hospital was shorter with Laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors and Affiliations

Ravichandran Kailasam Subramaniam

Keywords

Related Articles

Effect of Combined Thoracic Epidural with General Anaesthesia vs General Anaesthesia alone on Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Postoperative Analgesia Requirement in Abdominal Surgeries

Introduction: The combined use of epidural and general anaesthesia provides better intraoperative hemodynamics and reduces the requirement of general anaesthetics by blocking the noxious stimulus originating from the sur...

The Influence of Administration of Intravenous Clonidine on Dosage of Thiopentone and Cardiovascular Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation

Introduction: Various techniques and drugs have been used to attenuate the stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation. So the present study was designed to know the influence of intravenous clonidine on dosage of thi...

Histopathological Spectrum pf Ovarian Neoplasms in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Introduction: Ovarian cancer accounts for about 3% of all cancers in women and is one of the leading causes of mortality among all cancers of female genital tract. Incidence rate was 10.2/100,000 females in India in 2013...

Uterine Balloon Tamponade by JH Balloon: A Simple, Efficient and Cost Effective Method

Introduction: JH balloon (simple and special) is effective, cheap, fast and “easy to made” method to control atonic PPH, especially in low resource setting. Study was done with the objective to study the effectiveness of...

To Study Effect of Isolated Obesity on Diastolic Dysfunction in Echocardiography

Introduction: In the rapidly changing scenario of food habits among young working population obesity becoming a measure thrust for health. For this reason, we influence to study its possible association with CVD & DD. Th...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP428969
  • DOI -
  • Views 94
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ravichandran Kailasam Subramaniam (2018). Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Open Appendectomy and Laparoscopic Appendectomy. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research, 5(1), 18-20. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-428969