Comparative Analysis of Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery with Rigid and Foldable IOLS in Terms of Safety, Efficacy and final Visual outcome – A Retrospective Study at a State Hospital

Journal Title: Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 11

Abstract

Objectives: The main purpose of the study was to make a comparative analysis of phacoemulsification cataract surgery with rigid and foldable IOLs in terms of safety, efficacy and final visual outcome. Material and Methods: A retrospective analytical study was conducted on102 patients who were operated for senile cataract over a period of six months with phacoemulsification technique. A total of 102 eyes of 102 patients were reviewed which included 52 camp patients who had rigid PMMA intraocular lens (IOL) implantation (Group A) and 50 patients with foldable IOL implantation (Group B). The final outcome measures were the uncorrected visual acuity UCVA on day one, best corrected visual acuity BCVA at 6 weeks, the surgical induced astigmatism (SIA) at 6 weeks, the intra operative and postoperative complications. Results: The post-operative UCVA at day 1 was 6/18 or better in 69.2% in group A and 76.0% in group B (p = 0.294). Post-operative BCVA at 6 weeks was 6/6-6/9 in 73.1% patients in group A and 84.0% patients in group B. The mean SIA at week 6 in group A was1.10D (0.51SD) and 0.71D (0.32SD) in group B (p< 0.001). Average surgery time was 11.27 min (2.98) in group A and 10.97min (2.66) in group B ( p = 0.593). Both groups were comparable in terms of both intraoperative (p = 0.893) and post-operative complications (p= 0.721) . Conclusions: Our study has shown that though there was a statistically significant difference in terms of surgically induced astigmatism, the final visual outcome was comparable in the two groups. Phacoemulsification with cheaper rigid PMMA IOL impalntation in camp patients is equally safe and effective and could be a viable option for patients in developing countries where cost of expensive foldable IOLs is an important issue.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr Rupali Tyagi

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses and Postoperative Airway Complications between ET Tube and LMA in Pediatric Short Surgical Procedures

Back ground: Securing a safe airway is always the prime priority of an anaesthesiologist. Among the various methods to achieve this, laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation enjoys a major role. Although it is very effic...

State of Chimerism as a Promising Tool for Follow up of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Egyptian Patients

Follow up of patients after HSCT by chimerism detection can detect the outcome either engraftment, relapse or rejection. Many variables affect the result of chimerism either increasing or decreasing chimerism. Lineage sp...

Updated Study of the Aetiopathogenesis and Clinical Management of Mastalgia

Introduction: Breast pain or Mastalgia is a common and disturbing clinical disorder in females. Due to the complex and multiple aetiological factors, and different modalities of treatment, it poses a challenging problem...

Jail Technique for the Fixation of Unicondylar Tibial Plateau Fractures

Unicondylartibial plateau fractures with non-comminuted fragments can be treated using cannulated screws. We describe a new reconstructive technique of unicondylar tibial plateau fracture fixation known as “three screw-j...

Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma Arising From Maxillary Antrum in a Adult: A Rare Case Report

Rhabdomyosarcoma is one of the most common soft-tissue sarcomas in children under 15 years of age, and the head and neck is the principal location for childhood rhabdomyosarcoma; however head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma is...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP509492
  • DOI -
  • Views 48
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr Rupali Tyagi (2018). Comparative Analysis of Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery with Rigid and Foldable IOLS in Terms of Safety, Efficacy and final Visual outcome – A Retrospective Study at a State Hospital. Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research, 6(11), 663-669. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-509492