COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF 0.5% ROPIVACAINE AND 0.5% BUPIVACAINE IN COMBINED FEMORAL AND LATERAL FEMORAL CUTANEOUS NERVE BLOCK FOR POST OPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN KNEE AND ABOVE KNEE ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES UNDER SPINAL ANAESTHESIA

Journal Title: Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences - Year 2019, Vol 8, Issue 6

Abstract

BACKGROUND Femoral Nerve Block (FNB) and Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block (LFCNB) are easy to perform, have high success rates, have fewer complications and have significant clinical applicability for post-operative pain management in surgeries on the anterior thigh, knee and quadriceps tendon repair. We compared the efficacy of 0.5% Ropivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine in combined femoral and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block on the duration of postoperative analgesia in knee and above knee surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS 90 patients of ASA grade I and II who underwent knee and above knee surgeries of lower limb were included in this study. These patients were divided in to three groups (n=30 each) according to the study drugs. Group N (Normal Saline), Group R (0.5% Ropivacaine), and Group B (0.5% Bupivacaine). Each patient received a fixed volume of study drugs: 15 ml for FNB and 8 ml for LFCNB. The patients were observed for Time of Onset of Analgesia (TOA), Duration of Analgesia (DOA), Assessment of Severity and Time of Post-Operative Pain. RESULTS Onset of action was faster with Ropivacaine as compared to Bupivacaine (p=0.001) (Group R<B<N). Duration of analgesia was longer (Group R>B>N) in Ropivacaine group than Bupivacaine (p=0.001). VAS>3 was observed at 7.13 ± 1.01 hrs., 15.06 ± 1.72 hrs. and 11.33 ± 1.52 hrs. in group N, R and B respectively (p<0.05). CONCLUSION Combined Femoral Nerve Block and Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block with Ropivacaine provides early onset, prolonged duration and better relief in post-operative pain with minimal adverse effects as compared to Bupivacaine in knee and above knee surgeries.

Authors and Affiliations

Dilip Kothari, Sukhnandan Singh Tomar, Bhanu Choudhary, Mehreen Meer, Srivathsan J

Keywords

Related Articles

TREATMENT OF INFECTED NON-UNION OF LONG BONES WITH MONOLATERAL EXTERNAL FIXATION (LRS)

Infected non-union has been defined as a state of failure of union and persistent infection at the fracture site for 6-8months1 and union is not likely to occur without active intervention. Infected non-union has be...

MRI AND ARTHROSCOPY- CO-RELATION IN MENISCAL AND LIGAMENTOUS KNEE INJURIES

BACKGROUND MRI use for primary diagnosis of traumatic knee intra-articular lesion. The purpose of this investigation was to correlate MR and arthroscopic findings in a setup of knee injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS A descri...

&nbsp;AUDIT OF PERFORATION PERITONITIS IN RURAL SETUP AT NKPSIMS AND RC NAGPUR FOR 2010-2012

&nbsp;Fifty- nine patients who presented in the Casualty and O.P.D of department of General Surgery of NKPSIMS &amp; RC &amp;LMH with diagnosis of perforation peritonitis over a study period of one and half years wer...

COMPARISON OF GHRELIN HORMONE AMONG PREGNANT SUDANESE WOMEN

BACKGROUND Multipara is basically understood to be a parity of two or higher and has stable relationship with obstetric complaints. It could be seen as a reason for unhealthy maternal and neonatal outcome. Aims and Objec...

PEDICLED PERINEAL SKIN FLAP URETHROPLASTY FOR BULBAR URETHRAL STRICTURE

BACKGROUND In patients with submucous fibrosis, free skin graft, penile foreskin and Wolfe graft are useful alternatives. In patients with history of circumcision and with recurrent episodes of balanoposthitis, we used p...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP554799
  • DOI 10.14260/jemds/2019/81
  • Views 65
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dilip Kothari, Sukhnandan Singh Tomar, Bhanu Choudhary, Mehreen Meer, Srivathsan J (2019). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF 0.5% ROPIVACAINE AND 0.5% BUPIVACAINE IN COMBINED FEMORAL AND LATERAL FEMORAL CUTANEOUS NERVE BLOCK FOR POST OPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN KNEE AND ABOVE KNEE ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES UNDER SPINAL ANAESTHESIA. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8(6), 369-372. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-554799