COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF 0.5% ROPIVACAINE AND 0.5% BUPIVACAINE IN COMBINED FEMORAL AND LATERAL FEMORAL CUTANEOUS NERVE BLOCK FOR POST OPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN KNEE AND ABOVE KNEE ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES UNDER SPINAL ANAESTHESIA

Journal Title: Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences - Year 2019, Vol 8, Issue 6

Abstract

BACKGROUND Femoral Nerve Block (FNB) and Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block (LFCNB) are easy to perform, have high success rates, have fewer complications and have significant clinical applicability for post-operative pain management in surgeries on the anterior thigh, knee and quadriceps tendon repair. We compared the efficacy of 0.5% Ropivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine in combined femoral and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block on the duration of postoperative analgesia in knee and above knee surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS 90 patients of ASA grade I and II who underwent knee and above knee surgeries of lower limb were included in this study. These patients were divided in to three groups (n=30 each) according to the study drugs. Group N (Normal Saline), Group R (0.5% Ropivacaine), and Group B (0.5% Bupivacaine). Each patient received a fixed volume of study drugs: 15 ml for FNB and 8 ml for LFCNB. The patients were observed for Time of Onset of Analgesia (TOA), Duration of Analgesia (DOA), Assessment of Severity and Time of Post-Operative Pain. RESULTS Onset of action was faster with Ropivacaine as compared to Bupivacaine (p=0.001) (Group R<B<N). Duration of analgesia was longer (Group R>B>N) in Ropivacaine group than Bupivacaine (p=0.001). VAS>3 was observed at 7.13 ± 1.01 hrs., 15.06 ± 1.72 hrs. and 11.33 ± 1.52 hrs. in group N, R and B respectively (p<0.05). CONCLUSION Combined Femoral Nerve Block and Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block with Ropivacaine provides early onset, prolonged duration and better relief in post-operative pain with minimal adverse effects as compared to Bupivacaine in knee and above knee surgeries.

Authors and Affiliations

Dilip Kothari, Sukhnandan Singh Tomar, Bhanu Choudhary, Mehreen Meer, Srivathsan J

Keywords

Related Articles

A STUDY ON VISUAL ACUITY OUTCOME ANALYSIS OF PATIENTS WITH APODIZED DIFFRACTIVE MULTIFOCAL IOL IN TERTIARY CARE CENTRE

BACKGROUND The success of performing modern cataract surgery, where the technique and technology that goes hand in hand has increased, the expectation of patients towards spectacle independence has increased. In the earl...

THE HISTOMORPHOLOGICAL STUDY OF COLORECTAL POLYPS WITH EMPHASIS TO THEIR PROLIFERATIVE ACTIVITY

BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Most colorectal cancers are believed to arise from benign adenomatous polyps. The risk determination of adenomatous polyps for changing...

CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS IN DEXTROCARDIA

PRESENTATION OF CASE A 64 years old woman with known situs inversus and dextrocardia presented with complaints of right-sided chest discomfort on exertion since 2 months and history of acute coronary syndrome 1 month bac...

FREQUENCY OF ANTIBODIES IN HAEMOLYTIC DISEASE OF FOETUS AND NEWBORN

BACKGROUND Haemolytic disease of foetus and newborn (HDFN) is triggered by enhanced destruction of red blood cell due to immune-mediated destruction, intrinsic abnormalities, acquired aberrations, etc. Lifespan of infant...

VACUUM-ASSISTED CLOSURE OF WOUNDS- AN EFFECTIVE METHOD FOR DIABETIC ULCERS

BACKGROUND Wounds are a major source of morbidity, lead to considerable disability and are associated with increased mortality; therefore, they have a significant impact on public health and the expenditure of healthcare...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP554799
  • DOI 10.14260/jemds/2019/81
  • Views 56
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dilip Kothari, Sukhnandan Singh Tomar, Bhanu Choudhary, Mehreen Meer, Srivathsan J (2019). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF 0.5% ROPIVACAINE AND 0.5% BUPIVACAINE IN COMBINED FEMORAL AND LATERAL FEMORAL CUTANEOUS NERVE BLOCK FOR POST OPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN KNEE AND ABOVE KNEE ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES UNDER SPINAL ANAESTHESIA. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8(6), 369-372. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-554799